Jump to content

kasper

Members
  • Posts

    2,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by kasper

  1. Already had that one. #268 on this thread.
  2. Gardan minicab Oops. Not the minicab - wrong rear canopy shape SIPA s90 Same designer a few years later
  3. Yep. It’s not a comp air because on review that’s a pt6 not a Walter on the nose and the windows around the screen are wrong.
  4. Looks like a comp air 7. But converted to trike undetcart with increased rake on main legs. I’ll start googling but that’s my instant guess
  5. Patchen explorer. Must try harder it’s in the SAAF museum and I recall reading about it when wandering through the museums website.
  6. Junkers ju390
  7. So it’s probably a buccaneer
  8. Which one?Aeromachi AM.3 Adventura Were your last two and they were answered above. :-P
  9. RAAus tech manual requires either both sides of fuselage or on outer side of tail and now specified minimum sizes that will preclude most new reg ever using the tail so you’ll see many more moving to fuselage sides.
  10. #630 is still up for grabs
  11. But the snark was made at least in small numbers.
  12. Nope. The duckt has ducted fan and the winglets are up not down.
  13. Woo hoo!One down. How many others are going to have a go? Hints will start appearing next weekend.
  14. One off. No production plans. It was/is the design of an aero engineer - his fantasy.
  15. Nope. #630 has a person in it so not a drone. Still on offer ... who will find it? Note - it’s a still frame from a video of the flight I have so nobody can reverse image search it :-P
  16. :-P No. You just happen to be posting planes I know.
  17. Hafner Rotabuggy
  18. And I had no inside knowledge of the rises when I said a week ago $10 here and there is just noise and people will just accept it even though it bears no relationship to inflation. $10 on each rego and membership is 4,25% on flying membership 6% on 2 seat rego 13.3% on single seat rego No option but to pay but these increases are year after year after year increases
  19. We had the Northrop xp56 before so now we’ve had all three 1940 era xp’s ;-P
  20. Vultee xp-54
  21. Curtis wright xp55 ascender
  22. Ok. Read your CAOs people I’ll leave weightshift and 95.10 out of this summary and just do the 95.55 registered RAAus. Planes under this CAO are grouped into three for the ‘closely settled area’ ops limits 1. 95.25. Not permitted. Only exception would be written application to casa for exemption. 2. Factory built under 101.55 + certified factory built former Vh reg + LSA can fly over BUT not below 1000’ AGL AND must be able to glide free 3. 101.28 homebuilt + eLSA + 95.55 experimental homebuilt can apply to CASA in writing to get permission to fly over closely settled areas So basically anything that came out of a factory that does not have an ‘E’ reg or 25- reg can fly over but if it’s homebuilt you need written permission from CASA and you must still be able to glide free. Engine certification is in CAO 95.55 not in relation to closely settled areas but in relation to access to class A, C and D airspace ... and there you need written permission from CASA as well.
×
×
  • Create New...