coljones
-
Posts
1,726 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Store
Aircraft
Resources
Tutorials
Articles
Classifieds
Movies
Books
Community Map
Quizzes
Videos Directory
Everything posted by coljones
-
But the New Company might Play you off. An attempt was made to expel Ian from RAA by refusing his re-admission. There is probably nothing forcing ELAAA to service all comers. The business model for OPTUS was to refuse to cable up blocks of flats and to use Telstra copper in preference to OPTUS cable. There are no guarantees out there in private enterprise land and if you are refused service you can be offended all you like but no-one will really care. There might even be a ELAAA Customers Association formed to represent the customers to ELAAA.
-
Until we know the scope and authority of the ELAAA administration it is all speculation. It may be that aircraft owners and pilots could be, merely, exchanging one form of slavery for another as the cost of going to a different administration might not be free or easy.
-
Competition is good unless it is schismatic, where lots of money and energy goes into whether locktite should be red or blue. The fights go on for centuries and invent words like obscuratism and divide families and friends. Is there truly a better mousetrap or just wounded pride¿
-
perhaps the board might give consideration to the timing of receipt of resolutions by the secretary so that the notice including proposed resolutions can be placed in the hands of the membership with at least 21 days notice. As Kirk has pointed out some members don't/can't receive emails and thusly the use of 2nd class/ordinary mail would require a mailout at least 28 days prior to the meeting. I can't find a formal agenda and the Annual Report and Financials are well hidden. It would appear that if there is no motions to accept the financials or thank the board then there is not an opportunity to censure the board. There does not appear to be any proxy form either. Bugger!!!
-
Documents get changed all the time - the change gets proposed to the members, the mebers accept it, the secretary registers with ASIC - ASIC will accept it unless it is patently illegal. If it is only slightly illegal it would require a challenge, after registration by a stakeholder. Simple!!!
-
The old constitution wasn't much chop. No, the process wasn't to my liking. I would have preferred that they discussed the philosophy of RAA with the members first - the only dogma was "We hate the number 13!!!" There is nothing stopping anyone proposing changes to the new one. Don has shown that change is possible. If anyone wants to change the constitution then they could run a campaign here to get a groundswell up. All I have heard is that some people don't like it but I have yet to see statements of philosophy, where the current constitution is sub-optimal and a proposed solution. If people were prepared to do that then even the new board might support it (and make life easy for the proponents) I'm not sure that the election rule is much chop as the national parliament doesn't have multi-member electorates except proportional representation in the senate. I think RAA makes up the rules on the run and corporation law is very flaky in relation to elections.
-
I understand that RAA Member Guarantee it is $1. Not much when it would cost RAA at least $5 to demand and process those guarantees. This is why it is a limited liability company. Schedule 5 are the daily and periodical inspections - some can be done by pilots - a limited daily list. the 100 hourly inspections are done by AMEs or LAMEs. Schedule 8 covers maintenance by pilots and is a limited list - if it is not on the list it is LAME work.
-
Those that have competence will self select. There are those that can't pour water out of a bottle - these you wouldn't want to encourage. I thought RAA was enabling L1 awareness and competency through its L1 competency programme.
-
Back in the old days RAA had my $130 stuck in the bank for no apparent reason. Then CASA came in and showed us why RAA had my money (and increasing) stuck in the bank. It was because RAA wasn't spending any money worth a damn on qualified staff, infrastructure and systems. Basically they were doing nothing!! I didn't like the fee increase by deception (charging for the magazine) but recognised that something had to be done to bring RAA to a condition fit for the future. I don't have a problem with the last board running down the reserves to build a better RAA because that is what they should have done years ago. People maintain and renovate their houses, and families, and so one should with RAA and a short term loss of a reasonable magnitude should allow this to happen. There is no published policy on adequacy of reserves, there should be. I am not quite sure why we need in excess of $1mil in net assert backing but I do expect that the board would know an should publish this to the membership.
-
$400,000
-
New development at Warnervale.
coljones replied to Old Koreelah's topic in Aircraft General Discussion
And you have to be careful that the NSW Government doesn't donate the land and give a payroll tax and rates holiday and then have the NSW Government property arm resume Wanervale Airport and flog it off to an unsolicited proposer at mates rates. I am sure the government would call that a win all around and a tribute to private enterprise for getting NSW moving again. -
Give us an hour by hour heads up. How many hours have it done?
-
The Oaks, near Camden Jabiru LSA-55 $150 Dual, $120 Solo Jabiru J230 $180 Dual, $150 Solo Foxbat 22 $150 Dual, $120 Solo, Daves Flying School for Jabs 6 days/week Sydney Recreational Flying School for Foxbats 3 days/week No landing fees, free tea and coffee Grass strip (the falls are softer on grass)
-
-
In the case of GA each AOC is responsible for their own SMS including all costs - not insignificant and hopefully saving more in lives and money by incident avoidance. Nobody really escapes from cost shifting by CASA but the flip side is that organisations and individuals now have to take safety seriously.
-
Sorry Kirk but I can't support any of your resolutions as the clear direction given to RAAInc by the passage of the resolution to set up RAA Ltd was to conduct an election for up to 5 board positions on the unincorporated organisation which was to morph into RAA Ltd on registration. It is quite clear to me that the new constitution intended that there should be up to 7 directors. RAAInc could have simply appointed the seven in its initial application to ASIC but in this instance did the democratic thing and ran an election AS PROVIDED FOR IN THE CONSTITUTION. I appreciate your concern but it wouldn't matter when the election was called and run as we would probably have achieved the same result. You have tossed some valuable insights into this debate but I think you should recognise that you are castrating mosquitoes. I think you should de-stress, sit back, think about the joys of flying and plan your revenge on the authors of this constitution, written for the benefit of lawyers and bureaucrats not those who really run large not for profits. Don was there for the long March, perhaps you should do the same.
-
Experimental & Lightweight Aviators Association of Australia ASIC details
-
Thanks - much easier.
-
We don't actually know what ELAAA stands for nor who it represents. All may be revealed in the fullness of time, I guess.
-
ASIC Registration of this new organisation including directors, officers and financial accounts.
-
And, of course, with ASIC everything is secret unless you pay them money. With the proposed privatisation (moneterisation) of the ASIC Registry function you can be assured that it will get worse. This is tax, taxation, T.A.X. by any other name, so favoured by government on the right
-
The advantage of insurance is that in the event, unlikely or otherwise, that you cause a problem to someone else, despite the fact that you are bankrupt and have decamped to Brazil, the insurance company is still there and can pay out the poor bugger you messed with, intentionally or otherwise. Sometimes the innocent bystander, even exercising the greatest of caution, is the innocent victim of someone else's behaviour, or of someone else's dog
-
Not at all. Alongside the competitive model, monopolies and the public service are capable of delivering great results. If your mind goes back that far you might remember the shambles that the NSW power supply was in before the then NSW government gathered the disparate parts of the electricity industry together to forge the Electricity Commission to deliver reliable electricity across NSW.
-
Sorry maaate, Runciman wasn't the problem, he was a desperate attempt to be a solution. The wheels started falling off the plane when Eugene Reid was in the chair. If Reid had not been replaced by Runciman god knows where we would be except broke and out of business. How Reid got back on the board is beyond me. Democracy sucks (at times)!!!
