Jump to content

Keith Page

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,398

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Keith Page

  1. Keith Page
    No Don, It is a membership based organisation and something as big as that dose not get done in secrecy. Even though you will get a lot of noise it should have been reported that it was being done. There are a lot of clever people out there and only reason they were not consulted because they would not rubber stamp what was being done. I do believe a lot of people will abandon RAAus be cause it is moving to a over governed organisation. I suspect you are referring to me as one of those arm chair critics, news for you, that is not correct. I am out and about pushing the correct cause. KP
  2. Keith Page
    Thanks Ian. Kp
  3. Keith Page
    Well said Frank. Looks like no return from there. One has to listen to the people, incorrect or correct and they will respect the opportunity not this..... ....."This is what you are getting"..... that was done without any consultation. To me RAAus looks like it is on a similar path as the Canberra RSPCA had found its self. It is such a dreadful situation for RAAus from such a great organisation to this shambles now, the other interesting point the one who were yelling just a few years ago, you are doing it wrong, the bulk of them are and have been at the helm for RAAus to get to where it is. The jury and judges are saying how great things are now, I would hate to see it if they say things are bad. KP.
  4. Keith Page
    Thank you for that kasper. I have some friends interested, I will let then know. KP
  5. Keith Page
    Imagine that fence is a bit like the rabbit fence. KP.
  6. Keith Page
    Riley you have nailed it. Only thing missing, put the advisors in the ship as well, them I will give you 98% Which is an honours graduation. KP
  7. Keith Page
    Hello Gandalph,I have to agree with you, 5 board members is the better number however in this situation I will go with the 7 goes back to Frank's and Rod's posts. It is good that they broke rank and told us the truth. With what I have gleaned from those two and how I see the desperate need for the 5, one only needs 3 to get the voting in their favour as I have read and collected the other snippets of info we are to get some more radicle change of direction. Poor old octave is out wading through the Tech. Manual when he gets that sorted he will understand what a monster that is, RAAus is only to follow the regulations not add their own monsters. If RAAus goes mini GA so where is the benefit of recreational and experimental aviation hence then it will be cost and time prohibitive. Just look what kasper has gone throug to register his machine wonder who has the ego can't good sense have prevailed? I might as well all go fishing. KP
  8. Keith Page
    The RAAus Opp. Manual is monster a lot of the content is simply repeated, not wanting to sound disrespectful to me it looks like the document had to be a certain length and that what was done, well say a third could be cut out. Then it would still say the same thing. ELAAA.:- Consider the Opp manual as well not just the Tech manual. All the information will be out for all to see, read and understand. KP.
  9. Keith Page
    The last thing I want is to be likened to a Uni. tutor,sorry no short cuts to gaining the knowledge. The ideal process is get your own interpretation of:- *Have a good understanding of Part 149 because there is our new regulation base. *CASA requirements covering our form of aviation include the different classes. *The Tech. Manual. (New) *The Opp. Manual. (New) *The construction. By reading and having a clear understanding you will be avoiding the interpretations from the bush lawyers and those pushing their own agenda.. You now will have octaves interpretation. KP
  10. Keith Page
    Hello gandalph, Considering and regarding your post.. factor in what Frank has told us regarding Michael Linke ingoring the suggestions and advice and implementing regardless and jetr telling us only a select few saw the tech. manual before submission. Ummmmmmmm? Regretfully I have say that RAAus is not a member's organisation. While you are all pondering this, ever wondered why the desperate need for the promoting of only 5 board members, I smell a rat. Just to help you get a clear understanding, Google the situation see what you find? KP
  11. Keith Page
    As I said before jetr. The answer to the viewings, "Not all L2.3.4." Got to see not even the first draft of Tech. Manual let alone the final. Taking the information Frank provided I do wonder who is running the organisation. The other important point to consider, if the Tech. Manual is altered in any way it is to be represented to CASA as it is another document. I do believe there is no intention of changing the Tech. Manual those comments, we will correct it, is only lip service to appease the critics. KP
  12. Keith Page
    At least the the L2.3.4 people should have seen it because it concerns them. The other big question as you know a lot about it, how dose it fit with Part 149? Part 149 is what we are about to come under. If it is not compliant with Part 149 it equates out to be a deficient document. KP
  13. Keith Page
    Hello gandalph, Rod has answered the question, " Was done in secret". I can remember the yell regarding secrets, well this is the biggest exercise in deception I have seen. This manoeuvre has answered a lot of questions for me. This is supposed to be a members organisation. KP
  14. Keith Page
    Thank you Rod, """"""""It was done in secret""""""". Now the next question. What else is done in secret? Open and Transparent are not in the equation. Well jetr you must be gulable telling us we all saw the manual. KP
  15. Keith Page
    OK.. Must have been a very select few. How come then, there was information sent about "When the tech. manual was ready it would be sent to CASA for approval" When all this information was being sent about the manual had already been to CASA for approval. Well one could stretch the viewings and drop the grass route members.. at least... Give the L2.3.4 have a look and some input NOT all of those people had the opportunity. KP
  16. Keith Page
    Hello Don, Here I am again. I am wondering why all the moaning. I can remember the crowd yelling long and hard regarding the constitution none of them were really listened to. In my view that is very unfair that their concerns were not addressed, so now this situation has arisen. To top all that I must ask, why the Tech Manual was not shown to the members before it was sent to CASA for approval? What is next? In my view, looks like there was some poor advice handed out. KP
  17. Keith Page
    The original date was July however the weather gods intervened. Hence it was postponed to October. KP
  18. Keith Page
    Yes Turbo, Somebody in the RAAus office sent all that information. You are correct fuel exhaustion was included. KP
  19. Keith Page
    Bit of an update regarding Thangool. The small week end village is taking shape. Showers, toilets, eateries and but alas bring your own bed. Tell all your buddies it will be a good week end. KP
  20. Keith Page
    Good Morning Don, You and I at it again. You have forced me to make few corrections. *I have been unrelenting on the constitution as I did promise a friend I would do my level best regarding the inconsistencies. I wanted the people to look at the broad implications of agreeing with an unfinished article. *Ops. and Tech. manuals who would copy them, they need a lot of correcting. I thought intellectual property was supposed to be accurate and beyond reproach. *No personal profit involved with company as you are a special company accountant you will be up to speed with that one. So the profit line can be forgotten as of now. Forget the profit thingy. KP
  21. Keith Page
    People get about with the modern words - transparency and safety oh what fun they have with them. Just consider what they mean - to me they are incorporated into a structure so someone can be blamed. All just because some one did not open their eyes. KP
  22. Keith Page
    You are on the money F_H, has been my concern for a long time Home build, Amature Build, Experimental build . It is amazes me so many of the number of instruments which are in the big GA stuff started life in our little aircraft. Simple they got hold of put in (1)Made it more expensive (2)Then got it certified. Whacko all the testing, experiment was done where did it all end up.... .????????. "Home/amature/experimental is dangerous but where did their good innovations end up?
  23. Keith Page
    Bit of news for you Sue, I Keith Page did not post the ELAAA Pty. Ltd.. ASIC registration on face book. Yes I did make comment, governed by reasons obvious to every one. The comments were made because of the shananigans going on within the RAAus regards the opps manual, tech manual and the constitution, with an alternative organisation to manage the running of the light aircraft. Would not you think they will move their business to where there is clear direction and no politics. That one is not hard to work out. KP
  24. Keith Page
    DWF..Thank you for finding that, good to know. KP .
  25. Keith Page
    They need a section of, questions with out notice, if that is not the case, well the meeting will be a waste of time. When there is a fudged answer no one can pursue the fudge, they get away with their fibs. If they are honest the questions from the floor would be welcomed not "Shut Down". KP
×
×
  • Create New...