From gossip/rumour, I got the impression the plaintiff wasn't after money, but would settle for blood or substantial change (or something!). If so, the plaintiffs main motivation may have been that the accident was unnecessary, and that either people should be held accountable, or that change should happen to ensure a similar accident did not occur in future, or something along those lines.
If so, any settlement may not have involved money.
Either way, now that it has been settled, our board can now tell us what we got for our money, or what any consequences are.
I would be very disappointed if we are now told it is a confidential settlement blah, blah, blah, after having been told that a case in progress can't be reported to the membership in any meaningful way.
That sort of expenditure does require meaningful reporting to the membership.
And my post assumes the bulk of the expense was on a single case...I wonder if there are there any others coming along?
dodo