Today I passed the flight review which finally got me the RPL. I have had an RAAus Pilot Certificate for 5 years up until now. I didn't apply to convert, I did it from scratch. It makes no real difference. And it also depends on the school and if they understand converting the piece of paper, which mine didn't. I had to learn to fly the plane anyway and don't see the point in applying to convert it in advance.
I started a few weeks before I did my first flight by reading the Bob Tait BAK/RPL book. When the school put me through the test, which was when I said I was ready, it was all on weight and balance mostly. I didn't do the pre-solo etc. tests that cover the simple stuff, I focussed on what I didn't know. In theory weight/balance/loading is easy but it gets your brain going too. The Dyson-Holland books are actually more detailed and I think better than Bob Tait, so I used both to study. In theory you can skip the BAK but the school may ask you to do it as they consider it part of the theory needed for the Cessna. And it was good to relearn it, I was surprised at how much I had forgotten.
I also applied for the ARN early. That took 3 days. Then I booked the medical. Do that early as you need the ARN and the medical to get an ASIC, and it took some hunting around to find a Dr who was available within 2 weeks. The medical was emailed to me a week after the appointment. I had to wait 2 weeks for the appointment.
It took 10.4 hours in total, in a C172M.
The first few hours were just getting the feel of the airplane. Not too hard as it doesn't get affected by the wind. I would have considered myself ready for solo at 3 hours. The school I went to wanted me to be checked out completely on the C172 first. Getting used to the trim took a while, as it feels like something old and heavy compared to our lighter airplanes which almost feel like they have power steering by comparison.
Instrument flying is not too difficult but I did get the leans, and it needs to be practiced and it not going to mean you should go into cloud. I did that as hours 4 and 5.
The rest has essentially been getting ready for the review, and practicing forced landings and precautionary landings over and over, as that showed up that my handling of the airplane was not as good as thought. Low and slow is different in a heavier aircraft. Basically I was preparing for what we would do in a BFR, and it was more about getting those procedures and thinking straight than anything else, and not throwing the aircraft around and not constantly changing the throttle. The engine needs to be handled more gently too.
In summary I wanted to get it done sooner and I could have if I had practiced forced landings etc. in my Foxbat, so instead I did 4 hours of that, which included doing the test twice as the first time showed I was not actually even ready for a BFR.
I didn't have to redo the radio license, as that was assessed as good enough. I had to, along with everyone, do a basic English assesment which was just being recorded reading paragraphs from a book.
Next is nav's to see what the gap is there which includes controlled airspace. My RAAus nav endorsement comes over but I need the PPL nav's for the PPL, or at least enough to be ready for the PPL test.
It's not too hard, for me it was more of a general refresher of everything. If you are up to speed on everything and haven't gotten old and slow and full of bad habits, you will do it quicker.
But you have to consider why. I need a PPL to fly overseas, but generally a C172, which is all most of us could afford to fly, itsn't worth it. 2 adults and full fuel and a cruise of 105kts is all it can do. You can do better in a SportStar for a lot less money.
Good luck to anyone considering it.
Ryan