skippydiesel

FYI - Probably repeating what the Guru's have already said. Just got off the phone with a very helpful (Trig) tech person. Yes my transponder can be enhanced, to ADSB -OUT, by purchasing/installing an additional (GPS) module and getting it certified - estimated cost $3k +/-, part of which I can claim back. Yes! I can have get IN, if I purchase another module $?- no $ claim back OR I may be able to purchase a single IN/OUT module, at a lot more expense $? and get some refund from the Gov. My current Mod S meets all the requirements for entering CTA He also advised that IN/OUT is nice to have but of questionable cost effectiveness for the type of flying I do

I clearly did not understand the equipment requirements for ADSB OUT as in OUT/IN. As for my ADSB-Mode S working - I have frequently heard ATC warn IFR traffic of my presence - I don't think they could be doing this if my transponder was not operating. Will see if the foil hat idea works.

Until I made a very pleasant trip to Cowra, I had assumed that my ADSB Mode S transponder was transmitting "OUT" when it seems it was only transmitting (no OUT) ie I did not understand the significance/requirements for "OUT". I am fairly sure that ATC "sees" my ADSB transmissions. Unfortunatly I have no access to a shed/hanger, either to remove my aircraft from or return it to, with Transponder on.

To the best of my (limited) knowledge there is no dedicated GPS for my Trig transponder - have two other GPS antenna (not counting hand held) Dynon & iPad. Assuming existing installation is working (as expected) it already gives - ID, location, hight, speed(?)

Thanks all. Some thoughts on the matter: This is a very recent installation - only just passed 100 hrs. Commissioned in early 2022 Transponder professionally checked out, certified & issued with Hexadecimal code. Transponder not required unless entering controlled airspace ( very very infrequent) however I feel that it adds to security in congested environment like Sydney Basin. Asides from exorbitant cost, have, to date, been happy with system. Assumed all well and that ATC able to "see" me with all necessary information being relayed (so far no indication to contaray). Often hear ATC warning other (IFR) aircraft of my presence - system seems to work. Flight to/from Cowra raised question - on arrival Cowra, told that transponder signal not being picked up by phone/flight not being tracked. Further conversation added to my confusion - I assumed that my Trig was delivering "Out" signal - apparently this is/may not be the case (still confused). Told that a relativly cheap, non fixed, electronic gizmo ("Dongle"?) may deliver IN/OUT transmission with display of IN (other aircraft location) may be available in OzRunways on iPad???? Asides from the added safety of being able to see more airaft on OzRunways (than current blue bubbles) not at all sure of need to have enhanced transponder.

The Skyview has a GPS compass/ground speed read out - I don't know if there is a separate module for this capability - assume its integrated with main system.

This is all the information I have; EFIS: Dynon SkyView SE SV/D600 SV-ADAHRS-200 (Primary) Transponder: Trig TT22 Mode S Control head - TC20

Both GPS antenna have an almost 360 degree unobstructed view of sky.

My last aircraft had a nice homemade job (just for the cockpit). New plane has an at home, all over job and a separate, lightweight reflective canopy only, for away trips. Both by Punkin head. Photo of Mk1 away cover - needed fixing/adjustment, which they did.

Hi RF, I have Dynon Skyview system/GPS and GPS enhanced Ipad/OzRunways. Antenna for both on glare shield. Transponder, blade type, antenna mounted below cockpit. Any of these contenders for ADSB-S Out?

So what additional capability does Out confer to an ADS -B , S transponder? It already gives - location, ID, altitude

Thanks RossK, "1090ES ADS-B Out capable" - so the word "capable" does not mean that Out is activated? From the pdf you kindly supplied- "The 1090MHz system is a simple one-way transmission of data from the aircraft (ADS-B OUT) to ground stations, which simply listen to transmissions and forward them to ATC systems." My understanding - My Trig is broadcasting Out?

I am hoping that a knowledgeable person can explain to me the following (in simple terms): I have a Trig TT22 transponder - in my ignorance I understood it to be ADS -B Out. Seems I am mistaken about the Out part. The specifications for my Trig say "1090ES ADS-B Out capable" - does this mean that something need to be added/enabled, to have Out?

Great flight - The Oaks to Cowra yesterday. A little choppy /turbulent on the way there at 4500 ft but tolerable. Cowra extraordinarily busy with training, Ag & helicopter movements. Despite highlighting right circuit for runway 15 on my ERSA printout, I managed to do a left - apologies to all. Return flight via Lithgow & Warragamba was spectacular - smooth as silk at 9500 ft for a ground speed 168 knots (indicated 124 Kn) My thanks to Stuart for a friendly welcome & chat.

Sorry about the mussels (muzzles😁) - the combination of dyslexia/auto spell and passion sometimes gets the better of me. Still mussels are full of all sorts of good nutrition with which to build the energy to fight the good fight

It disturbs me to think that democracy/the will of the people, has sunk to the point where we say "c'est la vie" or worst still, believe in some special power/knowledge of the "authorities" that must be accepted without question. The likes of the SP Editor, spouting the party line/propaganda is an insult to journalism and the readers intelligence AND effectively mussels the potential for airing dissenting opinions.

This letter was nether published in Sport Pilot or responded to by the Editor : Re: Your response to my letter on “All The Way Up” & “Across The Guts” (SP 108) Dear Editor, ...................................................................................................................... On ASIC: Your statement; “……. we are part of a global aviation network that starts in our small airfields and we must meet the necessary requirements.” You have made a linkage, in this statement that, does not exist. ASIC, as it applies to Australian private pilots, wishing to access small RPT/Security Controlled fields, is an anomaly, who’s like does not exist anywhere in the “global aviation network”. Further; A network implies an interconnected system, working to some common goal. This is clearly not the case. ASIC is a stand-alone charge/restriction on private pilots, wishing access to certain fields, that has no benefit (goal). True! we must “…meet the necessary requirements” however there is no practical rationale for being obliged to do so. 23 years ago, when ASIC was first implemented, I like so many other pilots applied for & received their card. 9/11 Twin Towers attack (the motive behind ASIC) had us all worried. ASIC seemed reasonable at the time; its continued existence no longer does. The decades since have clearly demonstrated that Australia is not a prime target for terrorist attack on/by aviation. Even if it were, technological developments have provided much more cost effective and easier methods of attack, that ASIC will not, in any way, deter ie ASIC is redundant and has been for the best part of 23 years. From faulty memory, SP has had two articles on ASIC – neither was convincing. Probably because both authors (expert authorities?) failed utterly, to demonstrate their own support for the program. The continued application of ASIC, as it applies to Australian private pilots, wishing to access small RPT/Security Controlled fields, is an abuse of power (I note, that failure to comply, may attract a $5,000 fine – insult to injury!). You, as Editor of SP, should be taking every opportunity, to voice what the majority of RAA pilots believe – ASIC should be abolished. Regards ...........

No experince using "slime" in anything larger/faster turning than a mower tyre - it worked well. I share your out of balance concern BUT am more concerned that the temporary fix would get me off the ground, only to later land with a flat- could be nasty/expensive!😈

Was in my favorite mower/chainsaw shop the other day. They sell & use the slime type products. Topic of slime/pressure packs came up - they said it does not work very well on inner tubes (as opposed to tubeless). They didnt know why but speculated that it somehow does not adhere as well to the tube material. My aircraft tyres are tubed - I carry both green slime, pressure pack and a motorcycle patch repair kit. Contemplating ditching the slime/pressure pack and carrying a spare tube instead. What thinks the Forum???

Always used float bowl cork gaskets in the past (as shown in Moneybox photo above) - think Rotax supplied ones are now "Viton" or similar material. The Viton ones are a lot less pron to installation damage and seal better as well.

That's a shame - without a test pilot it's quite a gamble. Any chance you can contact the "guy" and get further details ie first hand account of fitting & using???😈

Moneybox - Have you actually fitted the BMW/Bing carburettor parts to your Rotax /Bing??

Onetrack Considering the number of vehicles stolen, robberies etc (not getting int assaults) and allowing for the likelihood that your list of stolen aircraft is a small sample, you are talking about 6 aircraft stolen over 51 years. In the scheme of things, to me, thats a rare /infrequent (call it what you will) occurrence.

I hope, whoever gets it, knows that they will be up for at least $10k in covering/painting costs (without labour) - my experince is now quite old, so could be a lot more certainly not less. Then there is the engine and any airframe/instrument/etc fix/replace. Even if free, won't be a gift.

Scaled Composites Model 81 Catbird Powered by 210 hp - I would expect it to be fast - 181 knots not bad for a 4 seater. I wonder what its stall speed is ? - with all those lifting surfaces I would hope low.