Jump to content

M61A1

Members
  • Posts

    3,861
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

Posts posted by M61A1

  1. I came across an interesting internet article which shows that ICP is "doing a Jabiru" by going beyond making airframes. I hope that the venture goes well:http://www.eaa.org/news/2012/2012-11-21_ICP-announces-new-LSA-engine.asp

     

    It makes an interesting read. The price is 12,000-13,000 Euros. 13,000 Euros = $AUD16,300 or $NZD20,600.

     

    Perhaps this is the dream engine everyone has been waiting for? We'll find out more details early next year, I'm sure.

    Looks like my Guzzi engine with a gear redrive.
    • Haha 1
  2. I have been toying with the idea of joining the local Model Aero Club. If things aren't looking up at Ra-Aus by February when my membership is due I will definitely give the money to MAAQ rather than Ra-Aus...I have flown a fair bit of R/C over the years out west... I will be very cautious. The DG is very, very light... which can be a BIG disadvantage with a RC Sailplane... We have wide beaches up here.

    I still have my old nitro power pack (panel, starter etc) so I am in a quandary... Do I get a nice ARF Stik as you describe... just about the best fun machine and perfect for refreshing the skills or do I go electric... they seem to have truly reached parity or perhaps electric is ahead now!!??

     

    Note: I agree with boingk. You have to draw a line at flying some models at the park. I would be very reluctant to fly a nitro or large electric anywhere but at a dedicated field.

    I love electric, low noise, no mess, just charge up a few batteries and head out for an hour or so. I use a cricket field in a nearby town, that has nothing within 400M. I've never seen anyone there, when I'm there. My favourite is a foamy electric ducted fan T-45, cheap as you can get, complete with 2.4 ghz radio and battery for around $150. It flies really well, you can go really slow or get it up to 120kph. I even put FPV on one of them.
    • Like 1
  3. If only it was 4 times the size... I reckon at 2 meters it would make a better park flyer.

    I disagree there, I have had quite a few models, something around a metre I find a good size. Still small enough to fit in the boot, and big enough to fly nice.
  4. Oh, you're replying to my question on the previous page asking why he wants to fly 500ft circuits !I was hoping that planet47 would tell us why he wants to fly low circuits where the terrain is unsuitable.

     

    She (the pilot) doesn't necessarily want to fly 500ft circuits and I have flown 1000ft circuits in the the 'silver. The slowsilver's net weight is 126kg and its upper limit is around 250kg. It is extremly susceptible to getting blown around and unless you've flown one of these, I don't think you could understand just how susceptible it is. A 10 knot wind is about the upper limit. Yes indeed I have found it pays to keep a 500ft circuit tighter than a 1000ft circuit and there have been times that I found the lower circuit level to be less turbulent particularly when the wind is from the northwest.

     

    Most of the land surrounding the tarmac and the grass strip is not necessarily conducive to emergency landings whether you fly 1000ft circuits or 500ft circuits. To the south is the river delta, bridges, an island dotted with power poles; not far to the east from the grass strip is a town area and dairy type farms and more power poles; to the north off the tarmac a few paddocks and then the trees start for probably about 7 miles; and to the west well that is just tiger country, with two small clearings, more power poles, a cemetery (and I don't feel like flying in there) and more waterways. I refuse to take off to the west cause there is no real option in the event of an emergency and I would probably end up parking it in the cemetery.

     

    The slowsilver is in the experimental category. At last count I have done around 30 hours in this particular machine and have done around 240 hours all up. Thanks to M61A1 for the advice - it is appreciated +++.

    Yes, I think I understand where you are coming from. My little 95.10 weighs in around 180 kg and has a climb rate similar to yours. It feels like the turbulence assisted roll rate is abut 3 times faster than the aircraft's recovery. It's one of the reasons I prefer the 500' circuits, if I were to climb to 1000', I'd be a long way from my landing area. That said, I do have a lot of options at my strip, the only catch is that I've either got to stay in tight, or get further away because of a few tree'd areas.

     

     

  5. When I first got the slowsilver I experimented with 500ft circuits and one day I powered off at the same point I normally did when flying 1000ft circuits. Suffice to say I felt abit too low especially on the turn to final near the river. So now I use some reference points which are generally dependent on whether I am using the tarmac or the grass strip which are sometimes geographical but mostly associated with the slowsilver's abilities. I generally now fly my circuits using lift from thermals to assist in gaining height cause it would appear the max climb rate is 3-400ft a minute on a good day. The slowsilver has a 447 motor and it generally chortles along at about 50-55 mph (not knots - great viewing platform but one can't rush it along). It is very susceptible to wind, turbulence, lift and any other condition that might like to prevail. Having said all that I have often found that I obtain unintentional lift on base turning final on the grass strip (I am not alone in this feat) and I do have to use some of those skills to land it.

    If you are flying a 500' circuit, you shouldn't be flying the same ground track as you would on a 1000' circuit. If you are half the height (of the 1000' circuit), you should be half the distance away.
  6. Is there some specific reason that the circuits have to be at 500ft ?If not then I would design them to be within gliding distance of the strip for the largest amount of time possible.

    .

    If you have a slow 95.10 (55kts or less in circuit) type like mine, you're supposed to fly a 500"agl circuit. It works for me, I do keep it in fairly tight though.
    • Like 1
  7. Hmmmm, good point. My Austflight bird does have the aft pan fairings, and they're very sturdy. I remember the previous owner mentioning it was an option. They do get in the way of inspection, but I have a borescope that can get in there to inspect the outside of the tube. I was actually thinking of redesigning the lower bracket (the one that both engine mount tubes bolt to and tie into the main tube. Looks to me like I could just use a longer bracket to better distribute the load on too the main tube.

    Will probably be fine. I had a WB A582 converted to take the Verner with nothing more than an adapter plate on the original upright engine mount. The mod had an engineering order done by a local CAR35 engineer and approved by the AUF as it was then.
    • Agree 1
  8. Thanks for those links. The dynafocal mounts on the Titans look pretty sweet. I'll have to call them to see if they'll sell me the machined blocks.This is the way Wayne mounted the 912 on the Fisher MK1. Looks brilliant to me, and also looks like it could be adapted to the Austflight SB582. Any thoughts ?

     

    [ATTACH]21497[/ATTACH]

    One thing to keep in mind.......see those 3 rivets in a line just aft of the fuse pan......I'm fairly sure that Wayne installs a doubler that runs up under the engine mounting point. Although it may not be necessary if you have the model with the pan fairings. I had a Drifter fitted with a 74 Kg (160lbs) Verner that was certified.

     

     

  9. Anyone know of a source of Bing 64 carb parts. I'd guess most would suggest Bert Flood but is there anywhere else ? I can't believe how difficult it is to get an O ring for the idle adjuster. A simple part but essential.Paul Toone

    In Brisbane there is a place called A&B seals. I imagine Melbourne may have a similar establishment. You will find they have almost any type of O-ring or seal you could want. All they need is he diameter, thickness(of the section), section (square/round) and the material it's made of ( nitrile, fluorosilicone,viton etc.)They're usually very cheap also.

     

     

  10. Wow. The individual thing may not tell a clear story, but add them up and put them together, they most emphatically do.

    But hey, let's all be that naive. It must be great. With that sort of attitude, everything is just coincidence and journalistic spin.

    As I said earlier, I am not suggesting that he's not guilty, just that I would like more information before I make up my mind on what sort of person the pilot is. Being in the industry, I am aware of how the drug testing is carried out, and that obviously there is an issue. That said, I have known people that have returned multiple positive tests, due to medication (yes the testers were informed), and still resulted in hysteria (although local).

    Objectivity is a quality lacking in our journalism, unless it's about a journalist.

     

     

  11. Once again, go do some research.

    I can only assume that you have personally interviewed all those involved and accessed any medical reports.

     

    On the internet I can find data that will support pretty much anything I want to hear.

     

    No-one here has said he isn't guilty, and the reality is that it's not looking good for the pilot. However, the press in this country do not have a very good record of getting anything right and love a bit of sensationalism, so intelligent people prefer to reserve judgement, wait for the dust to settle, and then see what actually plays out.

     

    Testing positive for amphetamines, leaving an altitude, being asleep and not responding to radio transmissions may well be facts, but they dont tell much of a story by themselves, and really isn't proof the the pilot was a drug dependent, reckless criminal.

     

     

    • Like 1
  12. Where have I been for the last so many years? I thought acceptance of a calculated level of risk was part of this scene. If they still allow bungee jumping parachute drops motorcross/ speedway etc we should be in air with the minumum of red tape. Practical safety by education and example and reasoned supervision. If we have to stay away from built-up areas etc so be it. perhaps as an interim measure all planes operate without a passenger unless that person is an instructor instructing. till all this is sorted out. Grounding the lot looks tough, though doesn't it.. Do you do brain surgery with a sledgehammer? Nev

    I suspect it has a lot do with a lot of people who want to go out and buy a factory built a/c with someone else's guarantee that that it won't kill them. I agree though, that grounding all aircraft instead of just those with issues is heavy handed. Also, bungee jumping, parachuting and motocross all have their own heavy handed legislation to deal with.
  13. Not in aviation, the LAME is at the top of the food chain for certifying aircraft to be airworthy and it takes longer/more experience to gain a license then a degree. The Aero E works behind a desk doing the designs Cheers

    Not sure I agree there. The engineer is putting his/her butt on the line for all non-standard repairs that he/she designs and crunches the numbers for. I would put them as equals but necessary for different tasks.I think perhaps a good engineer may serve us very well as a tech manager. Just as a good man manager is what we need to run the show. Perhaps also, someone with a background in quality management may work well to deal with the documentation side of things.

    P.S. none of these statements are any reflection on Adam's suitability for the job.

     

     

    • Like 1
  14. TurboI think your off track. These days the majority of law comes from the various parliaments. Like all things that come from parliament it's likely to be a compromise or in language we are more likely to understand what was potentially good got turned into Bullsh!t as it was modified/corrupted to meet the needs to allow passage.

     

    The reason for that statement? It's not up to lawyers to explain why we have the legislation we have, I believe it's the pollies that need to provide that explanation. Perhaps the point of confusion is that so many of the pollies come from a law background

     

    Andy

    I'm fairly sure that the laws come about because some dropkick does something stupid and hurts/kills themselves, the remaining family get themselves on 'today tonight' or other such worthless program and raise a stink amongst likeminded people to blame someone else. The politicians, seeing a chance to win some votes enact some vile piece of legislation. The community then find out there is a new law to make them safe, but also find that you literally can't fart with breaking a law, unless you have enough money to commision multiple studies to prove that farting will have minimal impact on anybody .
  15. Perhaps a major factor is the tiny wheels these slippery aircraft are fitted with. Never intended for rough strips, it may be safer to pop the chute.I was mystified by the pilot's description of the launch sequence: "The chute went off like a missile out the back of the aircraft and made a hell of a noise. We came to an almighty stop and the plane went into a nose down attitude as the parachute inflated. "About six seconds later the line cutters (small explosive devices) at the back of plane went off, levelling the aircraft."

     

    What was that all about?

    Bear in mind I know nothing of the particular egress system in the article, But as an ex-military Armourer (includes ejection/egress sytems), some systems have a mechanism (for want of a better term) that will allow gradual canopy opening, using reefer lines, and also change the bridle (the bit attaching to the a/c) position at some time in the sequence. I don't think it would be good to have your chute deploy fully immediately, or to have the load immediately on the front section of the bridle, otherwise the a/c would pitch up as soon as the chute deployed.
  16. Yea, it doesn't matter what engine, that sort of flying is deadly.. And you will excuse me if I dont buy the stats you claim. There are lies, dam lies and statistics.. The average Australian has less then 2 arms..;) Thats a fact that doesn't represent the true story;)

    The stats, I'm sure came from a "Sport Pilot "mag, and were just based on the numbers on the register and the number of reported failures. It's entirely possibe that the reporting is not accurate. That said, a well maintained 2 stroke is very reliable, it just needs more maintenance and doesn't last as long. Possibly those flying them these days look after them a little better, or use them less. One would need a lot more data to arrive at a scientific conclusion.
    • Like 2
  17. In a 2stroke? Your braver man than me. ;)

    Not that I think it's a good idea in any single engine a/c, but I recall stats on this forum (and , I think, the "sport pilot" mag) that showed that while there were a higher number of 2 strokes on the register, 4 strokes had more recorded failures (numerically).
  18. If they turn up with a "sports exhaust" in a cloud of burning rubber taking up two parking spaces, do you send them solo early?

    FL said:

     

    Being a truck driver I also should not comment due to the sheer amount of stupidity I see on the road all day long. The vast majority of car drivers drive to a reasonable standard, but its the "few" that really stand out that are truly dangerous. Often I think their issue is the failure to think beyond themselves, wether that be road conditions, traffic or what we all know as human factors.

     

    The issue of car drivers is well established but I have an issue with truck drivers who drive to the same standard. They are bigger and do more damage-a lot more. A small car tailgating me is an irritation but a big truck truck driven by a "professional" makes me wonder which corn flakes package he found his lic.

    Things must be different in Perth. In Brisbane/Toowoomba, there are a few standout drivers of a decent standard and truckloads of useless ones. Also the ones with the burning rubber and the one who take up two spaces are two completely separate demographics (young fool and older Subaru Forester/Statesman driver respectively).
    • Like 1
  19. Since takeing up flying I spend more time "pre-flighting" my car

    I personally would like to see some sort of pre-use inspection included as mandatory in the licencing, as it is in aviation and machinery licencing. I see many people driving "safely" at ridiculously low speeds with one or more half inflated tyres. The same people also seem to struggle to keep the vehicle in a marked lane.
  20. So I love flying and want more of it, I let my wife do the driving, she likes it and I'd rather read a book or play on the laptop/tablet....The quicker they make a computer do all the driving work the better for all of us in many ways in my opinion. A good example is cross city driving, when a car is connected to the grid and able to communicate with all other cars then red lights I think will become a thing of the past, cars will all schedule their time and speeds to ensure no conflict and probably no stops. Speed limits that are in place to represent the safety required for the lowest common denominator driver will now have no real lowest common denominator so can be what it needs to be to be efficient and safe. Fatigue....wont really be an issue then.....Flying however.....Dont want all of that for flying!!! even if it is just as achievable....

     

    Andy

    While I agree completely that automated transport would be safer, I don't think I'd like it for the same reasons as you wouldn't like it for aviation. As much as I deplore that dismal standard of diving in QLD, I do like a good drive or ride.
  21. A correct mindset is important. Some bad aspects of driving would be indicators for flying. Attitude doesn't just refer to the orientation of the aircraft. I have met a few who should not fly, but not an overwhelming number, so perhaps some effective training is the reason. I have seen some shocking car drivers. Nev

    I would factor in that most pilots want to fly, where most car drivers would really rather not drive. I think people that enjoy driving are generally better drivers, because they want to be better.
    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...