Methusala

I apologise without reservation to the site members and to Asic for my previous comment. It was late at night and I had read over the past week the pages and pages of evidence of RAAus failures. Please don't take my previous comment as an insult to our members.Kind regards,Don .

I find it stunning that the executive officers of the association, who in past editions of the magazine, reveled in hectoring members about the dire consequences of improper observance of statutory requirements vis a vi aircrew and aircraft cannot adhere to their own standards. It sounds now as though those in power believed that "some pigs are more equal...etc"! Just amazing!!! Regards, Don

This is going to cost us a bomb!

Anyone out there still boosting John McCormack as a reasonable bloke.

I was told by a member of staff this afternoon that the above information is substantially correct.

I use a dedicated efi pump to avoid any danger of arcing. I recall some discussion of pressurising fuel containers with air leading to the danger of the fuel container bursting. Of course a dedicated refueling rig should be the safest but some may be put off by high costs. Don

G'day, A little "steam driven" perhaps, but I use a Bosch EFI fuel pump from a wrecked motorbike. I have fitted a long lead and an auto cigarette lighter plug. Does the trick if a little slow. Don

G'day All, just want to say that we had a great time at Monto this weekend. Just arrived back in Canberra having picked up the delightful "Foxy Lady" Kitfox. Flew her part of the way and were very pleasantly surprised at how trailerable it was when bad weather around Kingaroy forced us to. It flies beautifully and one up is almost ballistic in its launch trajectory. Thanks to Maj, Ivan and Patrick for a great job. Now I may have to change avatar. Regards, Don.

Yeah, Castrol Activ 2T in my 582. Was asking a Penrite agent the other day about Hyper and he said it was fine for 582's. Just bought a 20l drum of 2T from Castrol agent in Qbn - cost $147.50. I'll take Ross Millard's recommendation on board as well. I'd stay away from the self mix, sounds like stuff for Mr lawnmower man.Don

They don't stall! Don

A friend had access to a Long-Eze years ago and I had a trip to Holbrook in it. It went like a scalded cat, about 170kt and climbed well also. Because of the high speed, the angle of climb was perhaps not so awesome but all aircraft are a mixture of compromises. They are designed as a fast traveling machine and the Long-Eze even had a bit of room for 'stuff' in the wing strakes from memory. Honestly, I think the biggest problem is that they are so comfortable (made of "plastic", the engine noise and vibration is well isolated from occupants and the seating position is glider style semi recumbent), one could go to sleep! Because they are so slippery (Very little frontal area), descents need to be well anticipated and they're only designed for very smooth and relatively long strips. Rutan was a very innovative designer and his work in space launches puts him in a select group of pioneering genius'. Don

Short answer to Metalman "YES!"

G'day all, I have followed this forum agenda when I have had the time and would like to ask a question of those posters who have excused Runciman's projected absence from the AGM. I would like to ask whether anyone knows the nature of his Defence job. It is true that some part of the Defence Force are "at the pointy end". However many are simply managers and administrators whose jobs can be covered by their peers. It rings a little falsely to me that at a time of acute personal embarrassment, the president is (perhaps too conveniently) MIA. I know that some will see this as a personal attack but I think it behooves the president to front up to answer members' questions. Don

I am a GFPT trained private pilot but have done the most flying by far as RA A. I think that one of the answers to controlled airspace incursion is to tailor the airspace to that which is needed. I have flown into Sydney many times on RPT's and don't think that Victor 1 needs to be so restrictive. I am not an expert but have also flown around Albury from Holbrook on towards Mt Beauty. The terrible terrain that is flown at low altitude in order to avoid airspace - well I don't think that they need all that space to approach in a sophisticated aircraft. I realise that many will disagree but this is my belief. Don

I saw one at Narromine Natfly one year that was powered by a 34 hp Continental opposed twin from a lighting-set generator that were all over Vietnam apparently when the American war was on. He said that he found the engine DUMPED!!!! at Geelong tip. It wasn't fast and it was noisy because the exhaust echoed off the blades of the prop. But he was satisfied with the reliability and the low fuel burn. Don't know what happened to it - only saw it that time. Cheers, Don

Thanks for the suggestions, Bob. Don

G'day Flyers and All, I wonder whether there are some open-hearted people out there who belong to an aircraft sharing group and have a written agreement or M of Understanding that they may share. I have been thinking of points and these are the ones so far thought of :- 1. 1. All decisions should be by consensus. However in the event of a disagreement a simple majority vote will be binding on the syndicate. 2. 2. Only syndicate members with current qualifications to act as pilot in command. 3. 3. All costs of normal (non-flying) operations are to be shared equitably between all syndicate members. 4. 4.The syndicate will pay rent to the owner of the land on which the aircraft is based. 5. 5. A dedicated and complete set of accounting records shall be kept by a person authorized by the syndicate. 6. 6. A dedicated bank account will be maintained to receive and disburse funds involved in syndicate operations. 7. 7. Pilot in command accepts all responsibility and consequential liability both personally and materially related directly or indirectly to his actions while he is operating the aircraft. 8. 8. If a member wishes to dispose of his share, the other members shall have first refusal in purchase of that share jointly in the first instance or else individually. 9. 9. Any application from another person to purchase a share in the syndicate shall be put to a vote of existing members. A majority decision by the syndicate members is required to allow such purchase. Any further suggestions or (grrrr...) criticisms welcomed. Kind regards to all, Don

A good rule in Thrusters is to maintain 50kts till 200ft or so. This way you will have a little more elevator authority if the engine stops. The tail is blanketed a bit by the pod and so elevator control is assisted to a greater extent by propwash than in other types. This and the well documented problem of wing angle of incidence make them challenging to fly until as Pud says you get used to them. Then they're a delight. You can pull the engine to idle and almost stand them on their nose and still not exceed the 80kts Vne (make sure you have plenty of height and experience). Best climb speed is around 40-42kts. Always have a good paddock selected for landing if the engine should commit hari cari. Don

Can anyone help in my search for a Level 2 to conduct an aircraft condition report in the Proserpine area? I am prepared, of course, to pay for this service. You can PM me on this site for phone details or with your contact. Thank you for your time, Don

G'day All, I was at Goulburn airport about 10 or 12 years ago having a look at a VP-1. Dick taxied up in his Stampe, it was a low hanging cloudy day about noon. I went over , introduced myself and asked did he do joy flights? He replied, yes and invited me into the front hole. As we taxied out he asked whether I fancied a $10 or $20 dollar flight? I replied avidly, a$20 one. We took off and climbed about 800 ft to cloud base and he asked did I wish to do a loop? I replied very eagerly, yes! We then dived to pick up speed and began about 15 minutes of very gentle loops, rolls, stall turns and the like. When I thought that we would be heading back he descended to about 200 ft over the Lake Bathurst area and we spent another 1/4 hr chasing ducks off ponds and generally having enormous fun. Eventually we did land and as we climbed out of the aircraft I asked him what sort of money he wanted for such a splendid 40 or so minutes. Completely straight faced he said $20! What a jewel of a bloke - we shan't see the like of him for some time. Vale Dick Nell indeed and we salute you. Regards to all and his family as well, Don

Yes, I agree with Millie. Many of us fly RC as an extension of our more "regular" flying. So I think that we would have an interest in like minded flyers, rather than go visiting sites dedicated to full time RC modellers. In my limited experience such types view real pilots as oddballs. Just my tuppence worth. Regards, Don

G'day Nev, It is amusing to read this post (I still can't believe it was 2 years ago). Of course I don't take any offense. But I still stick to my guns on this one. We have been trying for months to sort out the inlet mal-distribution on a carburetored VW. Ah the joys of this wonderful passion, regards, Don

Hey Robin, maybe an X-Air is more comfortable. Don't like going to Goulburn much - maybe you can come to our place sometime and I can see what flying in a Thruster with a training wheel is like? Regards, Don ( I have done a bit of touring in my VP-2, but it does have more room.)