Jump to content

octave

Members
  • Posts

    929
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by octave

  1. FT no I didn't pay fees between 1990 and 2007 I wasn't flying
  2. My first involvement in ultralight flying was 1988 - 1990, from memory it cost me about $40 a year for membership of the AUF. This allowed me to fly to 500 feet, no magazine no 3rd party insurance and there were many fatalities. I ceased flying in 1990 and quite by accident resumed in 2007, $160, 5000 feet, a basic magazine, wider choice of aircraft and now some 3rd party insurance, 10 000 feet. It is just my personal opinion but $185 seems like a reasonable deal to me, I pay RA Aus about $5 per hour per year. I wonder what the members who say this is excessive think would be a fair price and how the membership cost of RA Aus compares to other similar organisations e.g. gliding or motor sports?
  3. My first involvement in ultralight flying was 1988 - 1990, from memory it cost me about $40 a year for membership of the AUF. This allowed me to fly to 500 feet, no magazine no 3rd party insurance and there were many fatalities. I ceased flying in 1990 and quite by accident resumed in 2007, $160, 5000 feet, a basic magazine, wider choice of aircraft and now some 3rd party insurance, 10 000 feet. It is just my personal opinion but $185 seems like a reasonable deal to me, I pay RA Aus about $5 per hour per year. I wonder what the members who say this is excessive think would be a fair price and how the membership cost of RA Aus compares to other similar organisations e.g. gliding or motor sports?
  4. http://www.takeofftube.com/view/4028/the-copilot-song/
  5. good question, I would like to know also
  6. What exactly are the statistics? can you tell us how you arrived at this figure?
  7. are particularly fond of this boyfriend? but seriously the only thing I can think of is very short flights in perfect weather and then gradually increasing the duration. I went through a stage during nav lessons where I would start to feel a bit off, I think due to looking down at maps, I found that ginger tablets provided some relief without side effects.
  8. yep very cool, wont get to see that again, end of an era!
  9. http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html
  10. Took my 7" flying yesterday, it performed very well. Thanks Ian
  11. I spent 12 years in the RAAF as a musician, now a musician and music teacher
  12. the flying account will have to recover before I go to far but I am looking forward to some long trips, maybe not tassie but we could compromise CFI , how about Flinders island?
  13. Thanks all, very glad to finally get it done!
  14. yeah ignition I had to squeeze in before you next fortnight:hittinghead: not even enough time for me to exercise my new privileges
  15. Hi all, got my x country endorsement today. :clap2:
  16. I have a Nav Aid, I don't really use it in flight, although I did find it useful as a learning tool. It would be fine to use in flight although space is a little tight in the Gazelle and I don't like to have too many bits and pieces rattling around. I did make a table of distances and correction angles which seems to work ok
  17. couldn't agree more!
  18. Little degrees now make big degrees (and Nm) later That's why instead of using the whole 90nm to get back on track I would use a checkpoint 10,12 or maybe 15 nm down the track, that way once back on track I would still have my original checkpoints to monitor my progress
  19. I didn't round the .66 until I added it to the 2 degrees to parallel, that's how I got 3 and not 2.66. I would neither try nor recommend reading .66 of the sort of compasses we use.
  20. looks right to me, -2 degrees to parallel and -.66 degrees to converge with destination. Rounds up to -3 degrees therefore 007. If you did not apply a correction (and if nothing else changes) you would miss your destination by 4nm.
  21. My understanding of using the rudder to make a minor change of heading is this, I notice that I am flying 185 instead of 180, I briefly apply a small amount of left rudder, right wing lifts due to secondary effects, aircraft gently rolls left. We are still using roll to turn but as a secondary effect of yaw.
  22. OMG motzartmerv your a trekkie
×
×
  • Create New...