I believe that over the years, leading up to the hydraulic lifter version, Jabiru did a pretty amazing job of developing their own engine with basically just a few cluey blokes working together to produce a lightweight four stroke direct drive aero engine. Without the backing of a multi squillion multinational company. A big pat on the back for the Aussie spirit of having a crack!
The development included (amongst other things):
flywheel screw failures - increase screw size from 1/4" to 5/16", dowells, 'spider'
exhaust valve failures - redesign exhaust manifold to do away with gaskets
cooling - ongoing
induction distribution - several evolutions of manifolds
hydraulic lifter development - change cam profile several times, fast bleed lifters, now roller followers
through bolt failures (which appeared after hydraulic lifters introduced)
Does anyone actually know of a pre hydraulic lifter Jabiru engine suffering through bolt failure?
I know the Rotax 912 series of engines use hydraulic lifters.
Can anyone tell me what a Rotax hydraulic lifter weighs?
The reason I ask is that the hydraulic lifters used by Jabiru are a big, heavy lump of metal, something like 130 grams each (normally used in a Chevy V8). The original 'solid' lifters are very light, about 30 grams each.
Lifters are situated between the camshaft lobe, the push rod and rocker arm which is under spring compression load by the valve spring. As the engine operates the camshaft rotates, the lobe pushes the lifter which pushes the push rod which pushes the rocker arm against the valve spring. This all has to do this in unisen in addition to hydraulic lifters having to maintain correct clearances. When this is happening at operating speeds those heavy lumps of metal are expected to go backwards and forwards (stop and change direction) very quickly and the forces involved must be much higher than with the lightweight 'solid' lifters. A person with a better physics background than me would be able to calculate this in a flash using what I would think are common formulae.
It is my opinion that Jabiru are barking up the wrong tree persisting with trying to get the heavy hydaulic lifters to work (including now using roller followers to cope with the loads on the camshaft). Ian Bent is on the right track with retaining lightweight solid lifters (along with his other developments).
Why are Rotax are having a good run with hydraulic lifters (which operate at nearly double the speed). Are the ones they use much lighter than Jabiru's?
Laurie