I have asked CASA to define their term "busier regional aerodromes" as that is left open for all sorts of interpretations and directly affects many of us.
Qantas Link have increased services to many western centres but are in the stages of retiring the smaller Dash 8's to the larger 400 series to reduce the number of flights so does that make the aerodrome less busy? As they have stated in the discussion paper Quote: " The probability of these risks is quite low presently but increases with increasing air traffic levels."
The other bit that caused me some concern was quote: "At these locations, collision risk mitigation is the responsibility of the pilots, operating aircraft with a wide range of capabilities and equipment – from new generation Boeing 737 with multiple navigation, communication and traffic alerting systems to ultra-light aircraft with a single pilot and perhaps one radio. While operating practices have been effective to date,"
All CTAF's have required the carriage and use of radio for some time now so why the sly remark about ultralight aircraft and OMG, only one pilot! Incidently, all of the crew change aircraft, RFDS and aeromedical Kingair's have only one pilot.
I personally don't have an issue with increasing safety through electronic means but I do not want it or see the need in the current climate to have it forced on us. The other point to make is that some pilots (I am trying not offend here) don't bother looking outside to see conflicting traffic but rely heavily on TCAS and I think that is when the collision risks escalate.
We all operate very well with RPT traffic so there is something more underlying with this 'discussion paper' and the pollies usually leak something before they implement it.
I hope everyone has their say and make a response to this