Jump to content

Roundsounds

Members
  • Posts

    1,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Roundsounds

  1. How Qantas Ferried an Engine on the Wing of a 747 – Flightradar24 Blog
  2. I wonder who will pick up the bill for any loss?
  3. I suggest you dig out your licence and logbook and apply for your Licence to be re-issued. Under changes just over 4 years ago all licences / qualifications remain valid permanently. You’ll obviously need to get back up to speed and get a medical, but the Licence process won’t cost you anything. You’ll need to fill in a couple of forms, if you ring CASA they’ll tell you which forms.
  4. The QF B747-400RR Still can and occasionally do.
  5. Anyone at AA able to provide a report on how the event went? The Facebook Live feeds seem to show a lack of crowds. They also posted an aerial pic and it shows very few people mulling around.
  6. Taking the lead from international airport operators, there’s good money in car parking fees!
  7. Sorry, out by 10 - should’ve read Part 149. Djp, yes I was rushing that post and didn’t put enough thought into it. Really meant to have a level playing field with equal privileges.
  8. Instead of shooting down the GFA and RAAus privileges for more user friendly maintenance and medical standards, why don’t AOPA and SAAA apply for a Part 139 approval to provide a choice for pilots and aircraft owners?
  9. Not a myth.... Cleveland v. Piper Aircraft
  10. Thanks for making the point about motor gliders, the same priveleges are extended to private hot air balloon pilots too. (ie airspace access with self certified medical)
  11. Pilots operating gliders in controlled airspace in Australia are only required to hold a self certified medical and no requirement for any GA qualifications. You can see these aircraft and pilots operating safely in Class D airspace on a daily basis at Camden. The gliders also operate over the most densely populated areas around Camden Aerodrome, in the 40 plus years I’ve been flying there I have not heard of one medical related incident.
  12. Although an RAAus pilot is not required to hold an AROC, they are still required to be trained and assessed in the correct use of aircraft comms. Refer CAO 95.55, para 7.1(l)
  13. I don’t care about the politics, there are many strong personalities running these organisations. The trick is to harness their power and point them in the right direction - CASA and other Govt departments causing the industry grief. At the moment they’re throwing barbs randomely in all directions.
  14. I always pull through props during my pre-Flight, obviously do the safety stuff first (engine not hot, mags off, throttle closed, mixture ICO, chocks in place). I’ve found a number of issues before they’ve developed too far. A few years ago I was flying a brand new aeroplane fitted with a lycoming O-540 and found a soft compression. Turned out to be a valve seat issue.
  15. In this case I’m referring to the published AIP / CAAP procedures as SOP. As you say, these are a starting point and varied based on the actual situation. The problem I have being a growing number of pilots routinely make many broadcasts way beyond those recommended because they have decided to develop their own procedures. The constant chatter becomes white noise after a while, leads to an inability to make recommended broadcasts and makes flight training difficult. I train published procedures, students hear other pilots making unnecessary broadcasts and think they too should be. It also makes it difficult to provide instructional input and feedback as I always stop talking so both me and the student can listen to RT.
  16. You’ve obviously not operated at a busy non towered airport to make such a statement. SOPs are developed for a reason, I guess I am used to dealing with professional aviators who understand how standard operating procedures work. I don’t understand why people think it’s neccessary, or safer, to broadcast an inbound call at 10NM, 5NM, approaching overhead, joining the circuit, turning downwind, turning base, turning final, short final and clear of the “active” (whatever that means). Or taxying, entering the runway, rolling, full class D type departure report, leaving the CTAF and chatting to any other aircraft within 10NM of the CTAF even when there’s no possible conflict.
  17. Flight Management Systems have zero to do with flight control systems. Maybe you should educate yourself before making such sweeping statements. By the way, I teach aircraft systems and operating procedures for a living.
  18. You really don’t have much of an idea of large aircraft systems or operating procedures. The pilots remain the final defence in the case of many systems failures, how can automation deal with a failure of an automated system?. The likelyhood of sufficient Flight control systems failures to render the aircraft uncontrollable is less than the wings of your average bug smasher falling off spontaneously in cruise.
  19. “Pos Comms” is not a term I am familiar with? So, you’re to the south inbound to an aerodrome, a faster aircraft calls he’s to the north inbound with an estimate overhead 5 mins before yours, do you still give a position broadcast? If so why?
  20. Totally agree. My dad taught me to handstart and he learnt to fly in Tigers, Austers and Chippies, which weren’t fitted with starter motors. Pretty rigid and standard procedures for handstarting, the person swinging the prop is in charge. RAAF notes for the Tiger seem to have the procedure well set out, which is what I use.
  21. Would you be surprised to learn that a significant part of recurrent training for airline pilots revolves around what to do when all of the flash automation doesn’t do as expected or it hasn’t been developed to deal with a huge range of issues. There is automation of takeoffs, engine failures, unreliable airspeed indications, passenger medical emergencies, fuel leaks or imbalance and many other potential issues. There is no way there will be pilotless passenger aircraft within our lifetimes.
  22. You are all missing the point of CAAPs. I hear people saying they are merely recommendations, yep they are. But they are also CASAs recommendations as to how to satisfy a regulation, in this case CAR 166. Try defending yourself in court if there’s an incident and you have decided you have a better method of satisfying Reg166. That includes an incident as the result of a person not being able to transmit a broadcast because another aircraft is telling the world of their movements minute by minute or a recommended broadcast was overtransmitted by a pilot with verbal diarrhea.
  23. You too might find it worth reading CAAP 166-1, here a link. It certainly doesn’t say the more broadcasts you make the safer you’ll be. https://www.casa.gov.au/file/182536/download?token=ev1DY9ng
  24. I know it’s dificult for recreational pilots to navigate the GA regulatory system, hence the reason for making up your own procedures. The safe operation of aircraft in busy airspace relies on every pilot using published standard operating procedures. Here’s a link to the guidance document known as a Civil Aviation Advisory Publication (CAAP). You’ll note this is numbered 166, this isn’t a random number, it is the CAR the CAAP is addressing. Your self designed procedures might be ok at quiet aerodromes, but they reduce safety at busy ones. https://www.casa.gov.au/file/182536/download?token=ev1DY9ng
  25. That’s not what I said, read my post again.
×
×
  • Create New...