Jump to content

Roundsounds

Members
  • Posts

    1,029
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Roundsounds

  1. Which is precisely why CAAP 166 was produced. Based on many years of experience and collective wisdom a number of recommended calls are specified. Unless there is a real risk of a collision no additional calls are required. People who routinely make calls just in case and use the “I was avoiding a collision” card are ignorant and reducing safety. Derek, the PC12 heard your call, saw there was no conflict therefore said nothing - which is the recommended procedure. You spotted the PC12 and said there was ample room to depart, but chose to hold. Your choice, but to say this guy was going no radio is not correct. You’ve become used to people not using published procedures and expect professional aviators to use the same unprofessional / unpublished procedures. Not sure why you’d be pissed off with someone doing the right thing?
  2. See if the tower guys can close shop between RPT ops? I did a stint of training there and there were extended periods of time where we were the only aircraft flying, certainly long enough for something flying at 60 knots or better to get from Holbrook or Wang into Albury. That’s the stupidity of these rules, it’s obviously more dangerous to fly when ATC are working. Alternatively grab yourself a GFA issued gliding certificate and a motor glider, you can operate in controlled airspace on a self certified medical. You’ll see glider pilots operating in class D at Camden most days. They don’t hold a PPL or hold a CASA medical. These operations have been safely taking place for over 40 years.
  3. You’ve obviously got no idea how large aircraft operate or taking the pi$$!
  4. One of my pet hates!! A very recent RAAus post on bookface has a young guy holding the prop tip of a Jabiru he soloed in. Why hold, lean on or stand close to a propellor? Im not scared of props, I’ve hand started many hundreds of times in my career and my current aeroplane isn’t fitted with a starter. I treat props with the respect they deserve.
  5. Unless you’ve got a LOT of tailwheel experience I would caution you against doing high speed runs. You’d be best to go flying. The most difficult phases of Flight in a taildragger are the early part of the takeoff roll and the later part of the landing roll. By doing high speed taxi runs you’re exposing yourself to both of those phases. I’ve done a significant number of test flights in new / restored aircraft and I never do high speed runs. I’m certainly prepared to reject a takeoff if things aren’t going well.
  6. Any idea if Allan was driving? Given the reported age I’m guessing not?
  7. The 20kt NW breeze forecast for Saturday might make life interesting.
  8. I’m sure the performance review will produce the desired result. As far as increased safety, have they analysed the reduced accident rate against the measures they’ve taken to see what led to the improvement? Was it the L1 or Weight and Balance training? They are the only training courses posted on-line. There seems to be secret CFI stuff hidden on a restricted access site. This material should be made available to all members, if you only see an instructor for Flight reviews you may not receive the benefits of the training material being produced. The alternative may be that the majority of accidents are happening during training?
  9. No, the delegation is with an individual not a role.
  10. It’s not the qualification, it’s the CASA delegation.
  11. You need to check your facts on that one!
  12. The MARAP will continue, just be prepared to pay through the nose to receive the appropriate approvals.
  13. Because they are trying to prove a point, not sure what point. If you hold a CPL there are no exams to convert. I believe they should produce a guide to explain how their system works. ie exemption to certain rules and reg’s, which are effectively replaced by equivalent ops manual requirements.
  14. Ha ha, 4:52pm on a Friday afternoon, you are spot on Kasper.
  15. Same thing isn’t it?
  16. Nope, he resigned from RAAus to take up a position with CASA. His stint at CASA lasted less than a week for some reason. He’s now back with RAAus.
  17. The words “Titanic” and “deck chairs” come to mind. I check the RAA website regularly, there have been no new training modules released this year. The PDP didn’t get anywhere near eastern NSW and there are no links to the Safety Tool Kit documents. You’ve got to wonder what is going on at Fyshwick, morning / arvo tea and long lunches at the cafe up the road? Very poor performance. Log in - RAA - Intranet
  18. Didn’t see these jobs advertised?!
  19. Not sure, a loss to the organisation though.
  20. KJ? Or has there been a replacement?
  21. Yes, ask then follow up with email to confirm conversation.
  22. Maybe ring and ask the questions.
  23. Pretty sure this information is available online. Property details | NSW Planning Portal
  24. Apparently true... I wonder if he’ll sneak back into RAAus?
  25. The Freedom to Fly issue isn’t quite as AOPA are presenting it. I’m not a fan of either organisation, but I sure wish they’d stop the crap and work together to save the aviation industry in this country. CASA would be laughing at this infighting.
×
×
  • Create New...