Jump to content

Roundsounds

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,021

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Roundsounds

  1. Roundsounds
    Like I said, it's all ok until you're standing in court.
  2. Roundsounds
    Of course the only time a definition will be tested is in a court room. I prefer to stay well clear of any grey areas having been a witness in court and seeing how things pan out. It seems the side with the largest bucket of money is usually correct!
  3. Roundsounds
    I'd suggest you ask the CPL holder. If they say yes, they obviously don't know what the privileges of their licence permit. CAR 206 (commercial purposes) is a good place to start, you will also need to hold an AOC (this may change under the regulation reform program).
  4. Roundsounds
    PARE? Power - idle Aileron - neutral Rudder - opposite to direction of rotation (assuming that had been identified) Elevator - as required (upright/inverted) Smoothly recover from the dive as soon as roars toon stops Maybe the word sounded ok, but wrong spelling? Not how I do it, but....
  5. Roundsounds
    I don't use all three, I'm suggesting these are a few methods to help recall what needs be done. Any written checklist for simple singles would contain very little, before takeoff maybe something like: - flaps - trim - fuel
  6. Roundsounds
    If you receive training, by definition it needs to be from an instructor operating under an FTF. Should the person receiving the "instruction" have an accident, the subsequent investigation could prove troublesome for the faux instructor and their trainee. Worst case the faux instructor could wind up in the Coroners Court explaining how they assessed the "trainee" as being competent to conduct the flight. Trying to use bush lawyer skills and saying you were just "coaching" the trainee won't cut it.
  7. Roundsounds
    Interesting to see on one hand RAAus are concerned about R-LOC incidents and on the other new pilots are receiving minimal dual instruction. I'm not having a go at you Parkway, but it would be difficult to have exposure to a range of environmental conditions if you've only had 10ish hours dual instruction, let alone fully cover the syllabus.
  8. Roundsounds
    So if you're not receiving dual or PIC why log the time?
  9. Roundsounds
    Nev, I agree, but that's not what is being taught now. If you watch any of the multitude of videos being posted on social media of pilots under training they're using written "do-lists". As you say it has potential to reduce situational awareness. The governing bodies seem to be pushing this line. I find it's best to use a flow, system groups or pneumonic to accomplish the procedure, then review using a check list. That way you can jump from type to type without any issues.
  10. Roundsounds
    The use and reliance on written checklists in simple single pilot aircraft seems to have gotten out of hand! The last thing a pilot should be doing in the circuit at a busy non-towered airport is going head down to read a dumb checklist! If a checklist is considered really necessary it should only contain things that will embarrass or kill you. I think there are a lot of flying schools using amplified operating procedures as checklists, pilots should learn the procedures using flow patterns or pneumonics. This article by John Lamming is excellent
  11. Roundsounds
    I cannot understand how a person could reach a satisfactory RPC/RPL standard after 17 hours dual and 5 hours solo without previous aeronautical experience.
  12. Roundsounds
    The flight review to validate an RPC to RPL conversion must be conducted under the CASR Part 61 reg's, it will therefore need to be conducted by an appropriately rated GA flight instructor in a VH registered aeroplane. This flight review will cover RAAus ops, provided it is completd in an aeroplane with a MTOW not exceeding 1500kg.
  13. Roundsounds
    The result of no/poor change management processes. No formal review or sign off process, maybe a "hey mate, have a look and see what you think" but no structure.
  14. Roundsounds
    Yep, just a cut and paste of the L1 course created a couple of years ago.
  15. Roundsounds
    Try calling them 131757, ask for flight crew Licencing.
  16. Roundsounds
    That's not my understanding, CASR 61.500 doesn't say it's a one off. Design feature and flight activity endorsements should also carry over.
  17. Roundsounds
    You'll only need to do one, they'll carry across either way. Only shortfall with RPC will be lack of airspace endorsements, however these can be added if/when required.
  18. Roundsounds
    Sorry, premium Cabs have replaced limo's!
  19. Roundsounds
    Simulated I/F is a requirement of a Flight Review, a bit slack of the instructor/school.
  20. Roundsounds
    Sounds serious, must've threatened to cancel said pilot's limo service and force them drive to drive to/from work!
  21. Roundsounds
    In addition to the medical (RAMPC or higher) and an ASIC you'll need: English language assessment Simulated Instrument Flight time (only to appropriate standard for RPL without Nav and appropriate standard and a minimum of 2 hours if you want Nav) Airspace endorsement if desired/required. Flight Review If the school wants you to complete their BAK exam walk away.
  22. Roundsounds
    I'm sure Ian will produce a list of the incidents he claims to be aware of, that will save me the headache of trying to get the ATSB search function to find them.
  23. Roundsounds
    Please do...
  24. Roundsounds
    Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men. Harry Day
  25. Roundsounds
    The POH and operating procedures are the first things I give to students / hirers
×
×
  • Create New...