Yes I am sure; there was a major debate on this site and with the board members (committee) of RAA Inc. when members got to have these debates. There should be around 50 pages of the pros and cons on this site, but I just searched for "Magazine" and "Sport Pilot" and found nothing.
Magazine or No Magazine
The thing that binds any Association together is its group communication, gossip, hints, calls to action, notification of a success or failure requiring action. It needs to be an edited flow of information to avoid the catfights and cliques that occur in every big group.
The RAA was one of the best, and promoted huge successes like Natfly, flyaways, group build meetings, etc. catering for all the issues ultralight flyers wanted to know. It announced news relating to changes of rules, interpretation of rules and it had a running report on accidents so it was possible to use these to produce spreadsheets of trends.
Digitisation in the form of instant minute by minute news took over from Monthly or Weekly, or Daily news media. The scale of efficiency of mechanical printing presses, type setting, collating etc dropped down massively to the point where tens of thousands of people, starting with typesetters moved out of the industry and the cost to produce a professional magazine went up to unaffordable levels.
I'd moved into digital with club and association magazines in the 1980s, and found it much more flexible because you could talk to members even on the morning of an event.
RAA was no exception to this massive increase in cost to produce magazines the old way - in printing presses, so a debate was started about whether RAA should cut the printed magazines which had become a serious percentage of Member fees.
I recommended digital magazines because the only significant cost was limited to Journalists and most clubs/associations used their own people. The magazine could be collated, then with one press of the send button sent out to thousands of members at almost zero cost.
There was along debate on this site and within RAA groups around the Country and the group which wanted to stay with a printed magazine regardless of costs won the battle and RAA retained it and continued to charge members the significant cost for its production.
Quality of content
The Members of RAA voted to shut down RAA Inc and have a limited company operate recreational flying.
I would argue that wasn't a democratic vote, and wasn't in the interests of a group who not only flew aircraft but builts them and needed flexible rules which were able to be changed regularly.
However the majority vote was to have a central RAA Ltd company running everything.
You're free to squeal about content, but you're in the same boat as people who aren't happy with the latest Land Cruiser, except that you can't go and buy somewhere else.