Jump to content

Bluey

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    404

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bluey

  1. Bluey
    If it's safer than driving down the road then why is it that of the 30 or so people that I've known over the years of flying, 7 of them have been killed in the last 3 years. The statistics don't in any way justify this claim. Think of 30 people you know who drive cars, how many are dead? I bet the answer is most likely zero. The risks are clearly much greater than any form of road transport. I'd also like to add that most of the recent fatalities involved safe pilots not Cowboys. My sincere condolences go out to Ray's family and all of his friends. This is another very sad day. Bluey.
  2. Bluey
    Lets not assume pilot error in this case. The pilot did seek and get support when transitioning from his previous wing and the current one. Also, he flew it regularly and had built up at least 20 hrs and probably significantly more on the arrow wing in short time before the tragedy. He also, regularly flew with much more experienced pilots who also fly arrow wings. The incident in this case has two possible causes: 1. Pilot incapacitation 2. Structural failure Pilot error is unlikely given eyewitness accounts of the event. That is all I am willing to say at this time. A thorough investigation needs to occur to help identify the likely cause. Whether this is even possible is yet to be seen. Let's hope for all our sakes a definite cause can be found.
  3. Bluey
    33 years for about 100 fatalities makes about 3 fatalities/year not 33. That's still 3 too many.
  4. Bluey
    My sincere condolences to the families of the victims. Our thoughts are with you during this very difficult time.
  5. Bluey
    The safest way is to insert the nozzle into the tank and be sure that the nozzle is in contact with the wall of the tank just like refueling your car. This way if a spark accurs inside the tank nothing happens. The fuel air mixture in the tank will prevent combustion unless the tank is empty or nearly so. As for drilling holes and inserting conducting elements, I am skeptical as to their effectiveness. This is because fuel would have to come into direct contact with such elements to discharge. Fuel not in contact is going to remain charged and flowing fuel will acquire charge. Bluey.
  6. Bluey
    A static build up will only occur if the atmospheric conditions allow it. That is, humidity is low, generally below 50%. Plastic cannot be grounded. The fuel funnels when used in combination with a drum and spout is a problem. Don't forget the fuel itself will build up a charge as it swirls in the funnel during refueling. Don't assume it's always the plastic. A good practice would be to spray water to the outside of your plastic drum before refueling. At least this way you'll elliminate one possible source. Alternatively, don't refill when the air is that dry. You're asking for trouble. I had a fire about a year ago during NSW bushfires. I was lucky! Bluey
  7. Bluey
    Spoke to the gyro instructor the other day who is pretty certain turbulence had nothing to do with the accident. Apparently the pilot flew from somewhere up on the escarpment to begin with. He also stated that the conditions on the day would have been fine for a gyro. I can confirm that I've seen gyros operating out of YWOL with westerlies gusting to more than 25kts on the ground.
  8. Bluey
    I think we need to entertain the possibility that this plane has been essentially stolen and that it may have landed elsewhere. I find it hard to believe that the pilots were not involved in this incident. Given the systematic way systems were switched off it was probably done by experienced professionals. It all unfolded moments after the last friendly communication between mh370 and Malaysian controllers when they entered into no mans land between Malaysian and Vietnamese airspace. The pilots would've by far the best equipped individuals on that flight to know when to orchestrate the whole exercise. Seems too well planned for terrorists working on their own.
  9. Bluey
    You may well be right.
  10. Bluey
    This seems probable. Not sure about its direction and final destination but slow decompression is still the most likely explanation at this point.
  11. Bluey
    The engines running for 4 more hours is being disputed by Boeing as fact! This claim has not been disproved. From what I can tell the Malaysians don't know what's going on and probably shouldn't be in charge of the search.
  12. Bluey
    On a good day JORN can see Singapore. On a good day.
  13. Bluey
    The primary return relies on being painted by ground radar. The range of that would be in the order of 100nm for Malaysia. Beyond that the aircraft would be invisible unless military radar was operating in the area. It would have appeared on other radar north of Malaysia if it had continued flying in that direction.
  14. Bluey
    If the plane had continued on auto pilot it would most likely have popped up on primary radar somewhere. As far as anyone knows right now it didn't crash. Or at least if it did crash it's probably nowhere near where they are looking. It may never be found if it is in water.
  15. Bluey
    Malaysians are denying the plane flew for a total of 5 hours. Many bizarre claims have now appeared in the media. Debris seen by Chinese satellites turned out to be boats tied together. No sign of an aircraft. Does anyone know what is going on?
  16. Bluey
    This is a weird one. No mayday call to me says that a catastrophic failure with in flight breakup is a real possibility. Yet that would surely lead to debris spread over a wide area. Yet no debris has been found other than an oil slick. Very strange. Deepest condolences to all affected.
  17. Bluey
    Yes, Shane mentioned that to me a while ago. Don't know where they're at with that. If they really want to compete with the top imports and I don't think they want to do that. Then they need to offer the 100hp rotax as an option. The extra power is needed by the smaller wings to reach their potential. Bluey.
  18. Bluey
    Anyone know about a new airborne wing? Apparently due early in 2014. Rumour has it that it's smaller and faster than an arrow. Bluey.
  19. Bluey
    Yes mine was an airborne too. The issue may be related to the funnel although the funnels are designed to be earthed as well. If you use a nozzle on the drum, it would be wise to have contact between the nozzle and the funnel to reduce the risk of sparking. It's unusual that nobody is aware of this incident as the triking community is pretty tight. Bluey.
  20. Bluey
    Hi all, I came across an article in the pilots notes of the RAAUS magazine of another static induced trike fire while refuelling. It is similar to mine except I wasn't burnt and they used an earth from the outset. Does anyone know anything about it? Bluey.
  21. Bluey
    The reason for the question is that is what I've been told by more than one gyro instructor very recently. They've implied that the poor safety record is related to non factory built gyros and the factory built are much safer. I've recently made inquiries into the feasability of converting to gyros from trikes and have been wondering about the safety aspects. While every instructor I've spoken to has vouched for their safety, historical records seem to suggest that they can be quite a handful at times.
  22. Bluey
    Thanks for the reply Rob. It does seem as though there have been quite a few accidents in gyros over the years where people have just been passengers. Is it just a case of home builds being over represented? Bluey
  23. Bluey
    My condolences to the family during this very sad time. While flying may be safe when all is going well, it is not all that safe when things go wrong. Many variables can determine the outcome. The terrain below you plays a critical part as we all know. It is also likely and quite reasonable to conclude that some types of aircraft are more difficult in an emergency than others. I wonder where gyros fit in here?
  24. Bluey
    Last light in Adelaide was around 20:30 on the day. So not an issue.
  25. Bluey
    This is pretty self righteous. I think it's pretty obvious the pilot of the chopper did not see the aircraft on the active runway because if he had he wouldn't in his right mind have cut him off thinking, hey, I'll just pass in front of him by just a few metres. That should be enough clearance. Come on, pull the other one, you cannot be serious! After all the bloke had 10000 plus hours of experience as you so eloquently put it. Blokes with this much experience just don't ever f##k up, right? Bluey.
×
×
  • Create New...