KRviator

FML, does anybody actually read the AIP?

But then you are flying under the authority of your FCL, not your RPC... CAR 140 says you cannot fly in a Restricted area unless it is in accordance with the conditions specified in the notice declaring the area to be a restricted area. That notice is given in the AIP, part of which is the ERSA PRD as well as the DAH. The AIP also says you cannot fly through an active restricted area unless you are authorised, or cleared. As RAAus does not currently have authority to operate in controlled airspace, with the few exceptions of FTF's located in Class D towered areas that are covered under specific CASA Exemptions, a RAAus pilot cannot fly in, or request clearance through, an active restricted area. And yes, the AIP is a legal document, referenced by the Civil Aviation Regulations as a place for notices to be published.

It isnt hard to answer. Per my AIP references above, a MIL CTR=Class C. An active MIL Rxxx requires clearance - or "approval" if there is a publishedlocal procedure.Can an RAAus pilot request clearance into Class C normally, or Class D if not a student pilot? No. There's your answer.

It isn't that hard to find the info, you just need to look. If active, you need "Clearance" (So a CTA endo) or "Approval as appropriate".

Could have included staff costs. Was going to cost me $1600 for a CASA AWI to issue an Experimental Cert for the RV-9. $160/Hr x 10 hrs work!

Not negative - realistic... OzR themselves came out with the figure on their FB post IIRC, which is now removed, with the new one simply saying "we're talking tens of thousands here guys and it has really stretched us thin - we don't have any millionaire investors)", though one of the OzR guys does give an insight into the $$ at stake in his Prune post, "$10-20K per sponsor, across multiple sponsors...." It is reported to be a SAAA member (someone quite high up if you believe the commentary on 'Prune)that got themselves into this mess and I fail to see why any of the rank and file members should put their hand in their pocket to bail out an orginisation that would permit such a thing to happen in the first instance. As for why I hold ill will towards the SAAA, I would ask you consider my postings as regards trying to get my already flying RV swapped from RAAus to VH using the SAAA process. In the end I gave up and went back to RAAus, which, given the effective utility I have lost (in terms of payload, operational freedoms/CTA/NVFR/IMC) etc) should speak volumes. EDIT: Apologies - it was RAAus who said there was a $60K shortfall in their FB post - not OzR...

$60,000 from the SAAA membership?? Wow

If you're on a budget, I still use my original iPad - an iPad2 (not an Air2), and it still works no worries at all. If you can find a way to claim it on tax, then get the newest one you can afford!

$20,000 AUD more than the brand-new OX-340 I installed in my RV-9, but it would actually pay for itself in about 1800 hrs based on a 50c/L saving of Mogas/Avgas. Would probably be sooner based on the lower fuel burn of the Rotax, depends how long you want to keep your RV...If I was starting out, I'd still give it serious thought, but in saying that, a low-compression OX-340 with SDS EFI will run Mogas no problems, give great high altitude efficiency, but won't sustain that performance into the flight levels as well as the -915.

VH-BEG, a 2015 Sling 4.

I think the only one airing their dirty laundry in this instance is AvPlan and their dummy spit. OzRunways was the target of much vitriol and threats to go to the ACCC for the commercially-sensible decision to preclude AvPlan from exhibiting at an event sponsored exclusively by them. And now they have published their reasons for withdrawing such sponsorship, which I find quite reasonable in the circumstances.What I do not find reasonable, is the leaking of the commercial-in-confidence contract by someone (pissed off SAAA member?!?) to AvPlan and their petty response "We've been blacklisted because we are AvPlan". This is only a half-truth. From what has been published by RAAus & OzRunways in an attempt to set the record straight, AvPlan were invited to sponsor the event and deemed it not commercially warranted. That is their decision, and one that is understandable, however, failing to disclose as such in their dummy spit has now led to the withdrawal of OzRunways (due to the hatred sent their way for "Banning your competitor") as major sponsor and left the event tens of thousands of dollars short of what it needs to run with only 8 weeks or so to fill the gap, to the point the SAAA is going hat-in-hand to their membership asking for funding. Now, given my past history with the SAAA, and the implication it was one of their members who is responsible for this debacle, I am not the slightest bit inclined to help them out, and I would question if any other member should contribute any funding either... The big thing about AirVenture is its' remote location. Sure, it is handy for those that have a way to fly in, but apart from the townsfolk at Narromine, who else is going to go?!? It's a 5 hour drive from Sydney, and 9+ from Melbourne & Brisbane. That's an awful long way for not much. We are barely 2 months out and there is nothing listed in the AVA website about seminars, what is on for the 'airshow' other than the Roulettes, tucker, or even if an SAAA MPC is going to be run there (and don't get me started on that)...Not everyone can drop everything to attend should somethign pique their interest close to the event - believe it or not, plenty of people actually work weekends, and need to arrange leave in advance. Personally, I need a minimum of 10 weeks notice to get a leave request in and approved... I would tend to disagree slightly, for as above, it is one thing to say "We've been banned because we are AvPlan" - as they did. It is another thing entirely to publish the whole truth: "We were offered the chance to sponsor the event, turned it down, our competition did, and upped their offer when they were were asked and offered exclusivity, and that's why there's no AvPlan at OzKosh." Don't go spouting half-truths in an attempt to undermine your competition, because when you're found it, it is bound to backfire, as it has here, with the withdrawal of OzRunways as major sponsor. I can't see AvPlan chipping in $60K to cover the shortfall...And other than being an OzRunways customer, I have no association or connection with either of them - I simply don't like to see gutter tactics used in our sport aviation environment.

I am pointing the finger squarely at AvPlan for this one... OzRunways stumped up the cash initially, then more again when they were offered essentially the naming rights to cover the $$ shortfall. I note AvPlan has come out with "We were not 'officially' invited". RAAus says they were. OzRunways says they were - though a cynic would suggest "of course they would say that". And AvPlan is the one having a whinge about not being invited to an event now sponsored exclusively by their competition? Really? Personally, I use OzR, having tried AvPlan previously but found it too buggy and prone to crashes, however I had considered going back as I am coming up on replacing my iPad and was thinking an Android unit would be the go. Not anymore. Hopefully, the rest of those so-called outraged pilots on FB vilifying OzRunways will be eating humble pie now the full story - as opposed to AvPlan's "We are blacklisted because we are AvPlan" - is out there. I would love to know which "member-based orginisation" leaked the contract to AvPlan, but reading between the lines of the SAAA release above suggests it may have been someone within that organisation. This is extremely disappointing if it is indeed the case. At the end of the day, it's a sad day for all concerned...

I think there is a difference between the legal investigation conducted by the Coroner to determine the cause of death and the aviation accident investigation conducted by RAAus/ATSB to determine the cause of the accident. I don't mind so much if the Coronial investigation is not made public so long as the findings of the accident investigation are, to enable the rest of us to learn from them. Mind you, some of those Coroner's reports are interesting reading, like the Gympie Spitfire crash a few years ago when it was found there were blatant lies told about the weight to get it on the RAAus register - but in saying that, Coroner's don't investigate everything connected to a death unfortunately, and can sometimes misrepresent the at-fault party, as was found in the death of 3 kids on a train line in Brisbane a few years ago.

Nope, that's their email address. HERE's their website, though the AirCam is nothing new. It's been around 20 years or so, IIRC, and is a damn sight more expensive than you would first think! $200,000 AUD for a 912iS-equipped example, with the only real benefit over your bog-stock $25,000 used Drifter being the security of that second engine

ASIC (even worse now you have to front-up to an issuing body), BFR, RAMPC, registration, insurance & hangarage. A quick summary of all those totals a little over $6,000 per year before I've started the engine. But then my hourly operating cost is under $50.

Council is right. ASA will not put out a NOTAM identifying unavailability of fuel for a civil aerodrome unless it is serious, ie flooding in remote areas or something like that. IIIRC, they will do so for MIL airports though. EDIT: found the source. ASA's NOTAM Manual

And spend thousands more every year to keep being permitted to use it!

Sportys E6B for DAlt, and HDG/GS calculations,etc. and OzRadar HD for access to the BOM radar feed without using OzRunways.

Mendelshhon's have them but you're looking around $700-800 for a new one.

Then your aircraft is not compliant with CAO20.18 that requires a subscale settable in millibars.

^^This attitude is one I find pervasive in the trucking industry. "It's never our fault". It doesn't matter what speed the car in front is doing, the following vehicle should not that close. But In the tens of thousands of km I drive every year, I see it on a daily basis. "But I can see over the top of the car in front" is the most-used excuse I have heard..."Trying to give him a hurry-up" is another. I have to agree with you there. The more so when you have muppets in the TWU or the Australian Trucking Association who won't man up and address such issues or others, instead trying to deflect blame from where it rightly belongs following an incident.

But are we going to be mixing it up with HCRPT, really? There's more of a risk of an RAAus bug-smasher becoming a hood ornament on a 737 at Ballina than there is at Bankstown. Even if it is limited to Class D, that is a massive boost to RAAus.

Which begs the question: What advantage does your typical semi driver get by sitting 0.75m from the asre end of the car in front on the F3 at 110kph???

PPrune has a good thread about various places to fly in NSW, can start crossing some of those off your list.

CASR 61 is quite clear that "dual" time can only be counted when the instructor is actually occupying a control seat, so if you are solo as part of your training, you are the PIC. In turn, solo hours conducted as part of your training do count towards your Pax Endo. But you still need 2 hours time-in-type - but there is nothing saying these 2 hours cannot be flown concurrently with your 10 PIC hours.