hello mnewberry
just joined up here and strolling through some threads and saw this one. Bad luck on your test, your post was a few weeks ago so hopefully you have passed it now. There seems to be some confusion on some things (which maybe you also understand better by now). But if not, some parts of your post got me scratching my head which I would like to raise
In regard to the fuel, not sure what aircraft you were flying but sounds like you have your hands full if it finds it hard to climb with full fuel and 2 people. It is perfectly reasonable of you to ask how long you should plan the flight for, and unreasonable of them if they are unwilling to tell you. After all as a pilot in command it would be foolhardy (not to mention illegal) to take off with out knowing the planned flight time so you can ensure sufficient fuel and reserves
not sure what you mean by a re-stall, do you mean stalling a second time after recovering from the first stall - if so this sounds pretty scary and shouldnt happen, so I'm guessing you mean something else
bit rough of your school not to be able to give you a solid test time, tests put you under enough stress as it is
unfortunately for you it is pretty important to be able to hold straight and level - again not sure of your aircraft but it sounds very light and seems like you had a big job on your hands - this is actual quite simple in something a bit heavier.
what really concerned me with you post is there seems to be some serious confusion in regard to the difference between precautionary search and landings, and forced landings. What you have described seems to be some sort of mix of the two
- A forced landing is an emergency situation, one where you would be giving a mayday call. Classic example is a complete engine failure. This is where you land where you can as you have no choice, as you seemed to describe - identifying wind, picking a field long enough and flat enough (with no bulls hehe). The only objective here is for you and your passengers to be able to walk away from the aircraft (you most certainly would no be worrying about whether you can take off again).
- a precautionary search and landing is not an emergency (it may be to prevent an upcoming emergency - low fuel, bad weather etc). It would generally be an airstrip that you are not sure about and needs to be checked out. eg you plan to fly to a strip you havnt been to in a while and you cant get strip information from anyone )as legally required to do if not certified or registered in ERSA, then it would make sense to do a prec search and landing (you would also need enough fuel to an alternate BTW), This would be your fly down the strip at 500ft and 200ft to ensure approach and go around is ok, strip distance is timed to make sure it is long enough and that no one has dug a hole in the runway or no cows on runway etc. In other words to make sure it is safe and legal to land. Other reasons to do them might be low on fuel or bad weather etc and an unfamiliar strip is near by. If you have to land in a field that doesnt meet the requirements of a aeroplane landing area as described in CAAP 92-1 then it probably needs to be considered either illegal or an emergency (mayday call).
Gets tricky when you start talking about fields that are clearly not meant to be a landing areas but you can be satisfied of safely landing as per CAAP 92-1 (which is just advisory and doesnt legally have to be followed BTW). But I guess if it is unplanned and is not an airstrip I would be inclined to call it in as an emergency (you dont want to be stuck somewhere, injured with a busted radio and no one looking for you)
in my training/tests a PFL was generally done by the instructor suddenly pulling throttle to idle and calling out "engine failure". Prec searches would normally be done by being told a scenario .eg "there is some really bad weather we are flying into and you dont have enough fuel to return to your point of departure"
Again hope you have got it all passed by now, still extremely young so lots of time up your sleeve, I have not long got my CPL which I quit my job at 38 and spent the last couple of years getting it.
As a side note a GFPT really should just be a test of your basic flying skills and knowledge, seems they may have been a bit harsh with some aspects (although S&L flight is a must). BTW I never did my GFPT, there is no legal requirement for it, you can just keep going on to PPL (you just cant enjoy the privileges of the GFPT - passengers mainly)
another side not -dont be too disheartened at failing you test, took me a couple of cracks at the PPL and CPL