Tomo, Unfortunately you have reproduced an urban myth that is not correct, or at least partially incorrect, although your post is well intentioned. While I have been out of that field for a while now, I spent some years full time alcohol testing people in a variety of circumstances. From my experience 2 heavy stubbies will take the average bloke to around 0.05%. Some go a bit higher, some a bit less. Women generally will go higher, particularly on carbonated drinks - champagne's a killer. Most healthy people can break down around 1 standard drink per hour, again, some a bit more, some a bit less. The maximum blood alcohol concentration will ocurr 45 minutes - 2 hours after consumption, and then gradually reduce over time. However the body is a strange being, the reduction is not even, and is best described as 'saw toothed.' I recall one subject who was being tested over many hours, have a 0.06% spike from 15 minutes previous, when put under stess, even though his BAC had been reducing for more than an hour. In some people a meal will delay the onset of the reading, but in others it doesn't, although food generally doesn't keep a reading much lower than somebody who hasn't eaten. Mood does appears to be a significant factor. I have also seen a subject reach a maximum of 0.065% after 27, 7 ounce glasses of Fosters Light, drunk in just one hour. We found in some people, that blood taken from one side of the body, produced a different reading than the other. One subject produced significantly lower results when blood was taken out of his foot, but his other foot produced normal results. Don't ask why, I can't explain it. There are many variables, and these are a couple of extremes. The point of my post, is that there is no correlation between how you feel, and what your BAC will be. Also that just because on one day, you registered a certain reading, the very next day, the same amount of alcohol can produce a very different reading. There is also the argument that the experienced drinker can handle his grog better, than a green person, and to a certain extent this is true. The experienced drinker is practised at masking the effects of the alcohol although reaction time tests for both types of drinker produce similar results, especially for the out of ordinary ocurrence. Subtle signs of intoxication appear quite early, and most people are significanly affected (to the trained eye) at about 0.130%. Some alcoholics can hold it together to around 0.250%, but I've never seen anybody above that level, able to mask their drunkeness. To my mind, the 8 hour rule is a good rule, for the ordinary bloke who has 1 or 2 wines with dinner. For the person who's had a good session, I wouldn't want to be flying with them for at least 24 hours. Cheers Ferris