Turnerj

Some interesting opinions here, great stuff. It seems to me that most people are a lot more open to the thought of computer-controlled engines. Perhaps because it is nearly impossible to purchase a road vehicle these days without a computer controlled engine. So there is less of a fear of the unknown here. Price will not be what restricts this technology, if you had been told 15, 20 years ago that your mobile phone will by 2010 be able to find you on a map, check you emails, submit a flight plan, watch movies, browse the internet, control a remote control helicopter and play all sorts of mind-numbing games. What would you have estimated the cost to be? I think however, as Bandit12 said, Resistance to change will be what keeps this sort of technology away.

Hey everyone, I'm currently doing a case study for a uni course on Digital Fly-By-Wire (DFBW). Whilst researching I began wondering what the pilot's community view would be on the technology. Firstly a couple of facts for those who haven't a clue what I'm talking about: 1) In a DFBW aircraft, the stick/yoke (I'll use stick) is not connected to the controls directly, but rather acts as an input to a series of computers which take into account a range of parameters including (but not limited to) the airspeed, altitude and vertical acceleration (g's) and decides on an appropriate control surface position that would satisfy the pilot's request. 2) The stick now takes on a different role in the aircraft. When the stick is moved sideways, the computer interprets this as a request for a particular roll rate rather than a control surface position like in traditional mechanical/hydraulic control systems. The only exception is when the stick is centralised, this is interpreted as wings level and the computers will again solve complex differential equations to determine suitable control surface positions which will accomplish this. If you've ever watched any fast jet coming into land, you will have seen this illustrated. The elevators (which also act as ailerons) appear to 'twitch' as the plane is coming in to land. This is not because of the pilot, but rather a perfect example of the DFBW computers constantly chasing 'wings level' by adjusting control surfaces. All the while the pilot may be sitting there with the stick centralised. 3) As far as vertical (pitch) control goes, the stick is a 'g' setting, with centralised as obviously 1g and max aft position may be the maximum rated g for the airframe, or a little bit more. Depends on the aircraft. It should also be noted that this negates the need for elevator trim in the aircraft. Once a nose attitude is set and the stick centralised, it will maintain that position until the next input from the aircraft. 4) Power-By-Wire is also known as Full-Authority-Digital-Engine-Control (FADEC) this is where the throttle takes on the role of a power setting rather than a butterfly valve position. Mixture, Propeller setting and throttle setting are all computed by the computers to find the optimum settings for the requested power from the pilot. The first (and rightly so) concern most pilots will have is system reliability. Typically these DFBW systems are quadruplex systems, meaning that 4 independent computers all create the same data independently. If one computer creates erroneous data (due to any number of reasons) that disagrees with the other 3, then it is 'voted out' by the others and disregarded completely. The benefit of such systems are typically; reduced dry weight, ease of transition between similar types (using DFBW, it should be possible to make all the Tecnams, Jabirus etc 'feel' the same) and a reduction in pilot workload (due to the lack of need for things like trim inflight) Also, usually the computers used for FADEC are separate to DFBW, but I may be wrong about this. My main reason for asking is, with computers getting smaller and more powerful at an exponential rate, it is only a matter of time before this technology is possible in light aircraft. The Liberty XL-2 already has the world's first FADEC system in a light aircraft; the Embraer Phenom 100 (a 6 seat very-light-jet) has a some-what limited DFBW system as well as FADEC. It is coming. I can't wait to see how this technology is currently percieved by the pilot community. Cheers,

Laser Central in Brisbane. 07 3375 6022 http://www.lasercentral.com.au/ I can vouch for there quality. They do fantastic stuff, +/- 0.1 mm, can do cnc machining, laser etching, tubular laser cutting as well as metal folding. I'm part of a group at uni where we design and build a race car. Basically our entire car has been fabricated by them.

Pause the original video at 3:50, nose up control input.

Where did you get $365 from? The magazine is fine, leave it alone

They are, and they are precision approaches: Airservices Australia - Environment - The Brisbane Green Project This is what my school has been doing in Aerospace studies. Cheers,

Hi, The rules changed last month, (for Type 1 diabetes) you can now fly solo, after meeting certain strict criteria and having 15 flights with a 'safety' pilot with you. PM me if you like. Cheers, James

http://files.fsnordic.net/?download=2157 It's a free add on for FSX

Correct me if I am wrong, but don't they depend on the transponder being inside radar coverage to work? I thought that was why they were called 'Passive' collision avoidance.

I'll second that! I've tested the beta version aswell, everything about it is stunning and very realistic. :big_grin:

Finally, after 15 years of hard work by a few very commited individuals. Type 1 diabetics can now fly solo with a PPL in Australia. Aligning CASA regulations with the FAA and Transport Canada. This is great news for any pilots with type 1 diabetes (such as myself). Big thanks to those who worked hard to get this. Here's the link for more info. Civil Aviation Safety Authority - DAMEs and DAOs Cheers,

Hi Shags, FYI, there are lots of tecnams at Boonah, but no GA ones. Its all RA-Aus cheers, James

The first pic was taken literally hours before the crash, the second is from the courier mail. Hope she recovers soon. [ATTACH]10183.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]10184.vB[/ATTACH]

Hi everyone, Slightly off topic, but how about audible alarms? Our pool filter has a pressure guage on it which starts beeping quite loudly when the pressure goes over a certain value. The guage has a switch in the face with three positions. Off, on and test the switch springs back to on when in test position. from what i can tell the tip of the needle is magnetic and on the other side there is another magnet which follows the needle tip. When the guage reaches the limit the other magnet comes into contact with a piece of metal (highly technical term), completing the circuit. Perhaps this system could be used say for example on the oil pressure guage? I can't see why not, the all up extra weight is that of a 9V battery! cheers, James

Sorry, forgot the link OZx Forum -> Download Manager -> Anthony Lynch Scenery -> Ants Aussie Airports Boonah BTW, its free!

Gday Guys, A while ago someone asked if their was a scenery add on for Boonah airfeild. At the time there wasn't, but now there is. And it is amazing [ATTACH]8974.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]8975.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]8976.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]8977.vB[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]8979.vB[/ATTACH] enjoy:big_grin::big_grin: James

Hey Ryan, The RAAF certainly do do work experience nowdays. every term they send an email to my school asking for applicants. (i am in year 11) The time i applied the engineering spot git given to another school in the area . Cheers James

Thats good news (about the hangar) i would've thought redcliffe would be a more attractive alternative to archerfeild (being tarmac and all). but i suppose boonah will probabaly last longer than redcliffe.

Gday guys, I found this website a whle ago, not sure if it has already been posted but this is some fantastic scenery. Downloads Ants Aussie Airports for MS FS9/FSX It would also be great if someone knows any other high quality scenery websites they could post them here. enjoy!:thumb_up:

Ok, here is what i think, While some of us go on about how bad casa is, the board members are working hard by negotiating and working with casa. that is what i expect of the Ra-aus employees. one example is ADSB, just about every organisation wanted to go ahead with ADSB, except Ra-aus. now look at the result (for now) So obviously when we tried to get CTA, we wanted to be portrayed as a group of pilots with good airmanship etc, so how would we have looked if some of us tried to argue against PLB's? we would have taken 3 steps back from the 2 steps forward we have already taken. So maybe part of the boards job is to protect ra-aus members from themselves? Whilst i do think the board coulld have gone about it a better way, i am still happy with the job they have done. Cheers,

I actually cant get any zip file to download from this site? Frustrating because everyone has given this a good wrap.

The same cub. putting along the coast @ 500ft [ATTACH]11872[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]11873[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]11874[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]11875[/ATTACH]

I got the error aswell

Thanks guys, The breifing card is a good idea. i guess for the same reasons the airliners have that aswell as the demo.

Does anybody have any tips for taking a new passenger who is Brand New to the whole aviation thing? I was curious as to what tends too scare them / what calms there nerves. I am getting very close to mypax endorsment now and a few relatives have asked when I will take them for a fly. James