Jump to content

Geoff_H

Members
  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Geoff_H

  1. A person once told me that the two most exciting days in the ownership of an aircraft was the day you bought it and the day that you sold it.
  2. Having been in the business of Commissioning Manager on large sites for many years I was responsible for site safety procedures and enforcing them. I found that it was impossible without accountability and trace ability. Persons that transgressed the safety rules were sent for retraining, several transgressions resulted in banning from site. Documentation was essential. Everybody had to complete check sheets, these sheets were not tick a box, all too easily done and not traceable, a value whether it be a number or a quality were required at all times. These values were subject to frequent spot checks. The end result was commissioning without any errors, seems impossible but true, the cost of documentation was large but the overall cost was cheaper than previous methods. For safety we should be looking at the management of safety, not the Hi Vis jackets etc.
  3. I needed an ASIC Sea Port Clearance, you can use your aircraft one as the ID and security check provided that the Port expiry date will coincide with the aircraft ASIC. Hence no security or identy cost. The Port one offered was only around$60 cheaper! So how much does it cost to make an ASIC card? We are told that they are just covering costs...Does that mean that they are so inept at making the final document or are they just making a profit that they are not telling us about. CASA should justify their costs and expenses, a little transp
  4. Many documents on aircraft fibreglass finishing for aircraft talk about Featherfill as a final filler. It is nearly $300 per US gallon. I can't find any data on its weight compared with the general automotive style spraying putty. Is Featherfill lighter than spraying putty? Does it have any other properties that make it better to use? Has anyone had any experience with Featherfill? Any one used spraying putty?
  5. I have been trying to read the CAO's that apply to RA. What a convoluted set of documents. I don't think that I will ever understand them.
  6. I tend to agree with the 3% chance of finding those 3 items. I am quite prepared to accept a project that is well on its way or an aircraft needing an engine change, I am building a composite but its going to take several years, I have spent nearly 2 years on the design, made my first tail, far far too strong on failure testing so redesign and remaking. I really want some thing to fly until the composite is completed.
  7. Budget is around the $30k mark. I used to pay$5k per year for hangaring. Now that I am retired I was hoping for an aircraft that I could trailer home, if not a smaller aircraft that would cost less to hangar. Single seat would be OK, a project nearly complete or just needing some work would be good. Not sure that timber is my bag but either metal or composite would be suitable. I would prefer something that cruised over 100 knots. The sonex and Onex looked good, the Onex probably would cost a lot less to run.
  8. What operational and maintenance differences are there between a 19- and a factory made aircraft?
  9. Thanks, that answered my questions in another thread about the types of RA requirements and aircraft. Does it mean that a CTA is definitely out of bounds under all circumstances except emergencies?
  10. I am still a GA pilot, but now retired and my beloved Mooney sold I am looking for a smaller simpler VFR aircraft. Something that costs less but still gives that joy of flying. My wife hates flying so long distance is no longer a requirement. RA flying looks to suit me, however I am having trouble understanding the various aircraft tail number designations. What's the difference between 28 and 19? Why was the Morgan numbers changed. I want to limit my spending, which aircraft type should I buy?
  11. Any noise cancelling is what I would buy. I have two Bose, overpriced but good. And two cheapest type, virtually useless, give to passengers I have a grudge with lol
  12. One of the reasons for experimenting with nylon is its great engineering properties. One is its low coefficient of friction, that makes it good for low speed gears and similar. Having a lower interlaminar strength, similar to glass/epoxy structures. Hence design features such as shear stress needs to be taken into account, with metals the shear stress is so high that it's not usually needed to be calculated. Nylon is great for low speed gears where the laminations are at the vertical plane to the axis. The dimensions maybe not great in low cost printers but I have read that you can machine nylon parts, I have not tried to do this yet. I will make a part in the new year and put it in the lathe and see the results, stay tuned. But don't forget that you could make a composite aluminium/steel and nylon part using the advantages of both, Nylon can be cemented or welded to other nylon parts to make a part much larger than the bed size. I believe that this is one of the most exciting technologies to come to home aircraft building.
  13. This is a picture of the test part for the feasibility of a nylon printed flap. Notice the curve of the leading and trailing edge this could be remedied by a themally constant environment, or a heated box around the printer. It is light but not strong enough.
  14. This is a picture of the test part for the feasibility of a nylon printed flap. Notice the curve of the leading and trailing edge this could be remedied by a themally constant environment, or a heated box around the printer. It is light but not strong enough.
  15. I tried to print a flap. Each segment to be made so a thin section aluminium tube could hold together each 200mm length of flap. To get it light I had thin walls of the flap. Printed one in nylon. It did not work, the youngs modulus of nylon is low compared to aluminum. With equivalent weight the nylon part was not Ridgid enough and flexed significantly.... Maybe a different material for printing will help some day.
  16. At present it is 200 x 200. I use hairspray on glass for nylon and a variety of fiber based plates for other materials. For PLA I use masking tape.
  17. I have a modified Aldi Cocoon.
  18. Never tried the auto adjust features. I always watch the first layer very carefully and adjust as required to get best bed adhesion. I manually adjust temperatures during the print, I should put the changes in the GCode. I must do this one day. I spend heaps of time watching the print.
  19. Yes. The temperature is destroying my Teflon guides, but I have a metallic hot end on the way. One of my big problems was curling and separation of the part from the bed. I did some bed temperature measurement and found that the bed temperature was between 20 & 30 deg C below the measured temperature. Getting much better results now. Only nylon has the temperature strength and chemical resistance required. Early parts split along laminations when hit with a hammer on the vyce. To get better built quality I am building a thermal box for the printer
  20. I noticed in another thread that a discussion on 3D printing came up. I have been experimenting with printing various parts for my project. I have found that the weakest part of a printed part is the layer bonds, hence I would not use it for undercarriage parts, but for throttle quadrant rudder pedals and the like it seems to be OK. Weight is significantly lighter than aluminum parts owing to the lower density and 'honeycomb' style centre. The minimum material that could be used is nylon. Printing nylon is not for the faint hearted with much experimenting to get an acceptable product, dimension and surface finish often lead much to be desired. However my products are getting better as I solve each problem. I have had to modify my printer several times to improve the part quality. I designed each left using 3d AutoCAD then transfer the design to an appropriate language for the printing, quite cumbersome. With time I expect to be making parts that can be service sensitive in requiring strength and endurance. Maybe undercarriage parts one day.
  21. Hi Lighspeed, I am about to start cutting foam, if you're interested maybe you would like to come and have a look. I need someone to help with the hot wire cutting, wife is not the technical type. She doesn't like flying but to her credit we saw most of Oz in the Moon when we had it.
  22. OK but am at the late design stage. It will be fibreglass and foam. I am busy making templates and trying to 3d printer rudder pedals/brakes and just blew up my 3d printer.... very sad at the moment.
  23. I am not so sure. They are stressed to aerobatic levels. They are very strong. They also pioneered an aircraft foam and aluminum construction.
  24. My project at the moment is a Cri Cri like aircraft. I looked into using the model aircraft jets. They have a very low "compression ratio" indicative of a cheap compressor and hence are very very fuel inefficient, very short range. I am using 2 Hirth single cylinder engines. And also a Steel/Kevlar rollover bar.
  25. In a "dirty" Aircraft the difference between gear up and down is small and the weight of retractable gear ends up making only a small speed gain. However in the Mooney, a very "clean" aerodynamic aircraft the difference was significant. Had a gear retract problem once, gear down and the craft could not get above 120 knots, gear up it got 165 knots. OK, if it were to be fixed gear the gear doors wouldn't be a drag etc but retract can make a significant difference.
×
×
  • Create New...