Jump to content

Red

Members
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Red

  1. Hello Blue, its more the extra 20 or so kilos of fuel I was thinking of rather than the tank weight , it must be ok if care taken obviously but I know for sure it would take my particular Nynja outside limits unless I adjusted something, maybe put the battery forward of irewall in my case. Yea a few are fitting wing tanks but they of course don't shift the weight so far back.
  2. Blue, that must really take the CG close to the rear limit, Can you still have a Luggage Hammock with that tank?
  3. RFGuy, I didnt like the look of that connector either So did this...
  4. Yea Its quite Odd seeing a Stampe in RAF markings, I wonder if its historically correct?
  5. Id love to have a backseat with a proper pilot in one of them Phoons Have flown a small section, but its a bit different at 70 knots😁 (don't try this on a weekday) p.s Mach refers to the place Machynllyth nothing to do with the speed of sound which is what naturally comes to mind
  6. A Russian mission could likely get them down a lot quicker, but well.....
  7. I didnt have much luck with my venture into the alternative area...my problem centred around the drive arrangement which consisted of a 582 reduction box and centirugal clutch joind by a rubber coupling, the parts didnt agree with each other and one almost total loss of drive in climbout and the problems of dealing with the very unhelpfull german supplier of the clutch meant I gave in and fitted a 912. But its always good to see alternative engines tried and the viking does seem pretty sorted. What do you have in your Skyranger?
  8. Oh no doubt on the basics of the story, but like the bloke down the pub what you read in the daily mail will be... how can I say this?....Somewhat embellished 😁
  9. Daily mail = "...bloke down the pub told me ...."
  10. My hovercraft is full of eels
  11. France?
  12. Can't see how they walk away from that one😁
  13. Thats a more honest way to do it , but over here when you see the hours match exactly the same its usually because the owner hasnt fitted a Hobbs and has taken the aircrafts flight hours and written them down as engine hours, which in the space of over 2000hrs can mean a shed load of undocumented engine hours spent warming up, taxiing, given a ground run after oil change etc.
  14. Yea I know happens all the time over here some even do it by logging engine hours to tally with what there flight time was, always raises a smile when I see times match in adverts Still have no idea what difference abeing a Rotax engine has to do with it Oh and lighten up, I made no inference it was an australian only thing.
  15. Red

    PZL I-22 Iryda

    Header Picture is a Kawasaki T4
  16. Sorry, I have no idea what difference that makes to how you record hours???
  17. Engine and airframe hours the same....always gives me a giggle
  18. Was present at the show that year and I've yet to see this dispaly beat for shear manouvrabilty displayed, though as I tried to say before its part pilot ability and part what the aircraft is capable of performing and structuraly withstanding
  19. Was referring to the airbus helicopter Ss
  20. i don't get your point? it's a Transall and happened years ago.
  21. Yep, ADSB broadcasts flight level I.E. what your Altimeter would show when set to 1013Hpa. It wont show correct Altitude AMSL unless the actual QNH at that time is also 1013 Hpa. Im not sure why this is being discussed though
  22. Some lovely grass strips around the Welsh Borders, have fun
  23. Video is showing is a higher compression than normal for the time engine with a 2 stage induction system, never heard it called Over Compression before, seems like one of those terminology inventions Americans are fond of
  24. Wow, I thought that was an obscure one.
×
×
  • Create New...