Jump to content

danny_galaga

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,781

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Everything posted by danny_galaga

  1. danny_galaga
    Agreed. Boonah has plenty of fields around it, but results may vary with emergency landings 😄 As long as you are within gliding distance you can easily keep out of any traffics way. After a few basic tests, which we have done it would be very safe to fly say five to ten miles away. All academic at the moment, all these public holidays have their downside as I can't get my guy to fly for a while.
  2. danny_galaga
    The aircraft has to be test flown around the airfield it's based at. Im mostly bummed about the fact I probably won't get to test fly my own aircraft on my own and I'll have to wait for the remaining 23 hours.
  3. danny_galaga
  4. danny_galaga
    This in fact is my next step if all else fails. I haven't asked yet but there's a guy who lives nearby who might be able to help. He's built a few aircraft and finished incomplete projects so would be easy to get him on the test schedule.
  5. danny_galaga
    I forgot to mention that we applied with both our names. But Ra Aus knocked me back due to my lack of recent flying hours. Which I guess is fair enough .Otherwise I wouldn't even consider selling it until I finished off the test flying.
  6. danny_galaga
    *THINKING OUT LOUD EDITION* As per heading, my plane only has about 3 hours of test flying on it. I'm not on the test flight schedule unfortunately. My guy at the airfield is on the paperwork. I haven't talked to him yet, but I do know he's not interested in doing all 25 hours himself. Has anyone been in a situation like this? What are the pros and cons? I'm guessing a big con would sale price.
  7. danny_galaga
    While I'm sure there must be some corruption in China, the perpetrators have to really be in the know, as they have the death penalty for such things there. But other Asian countries...
  8. danny_galaga
    So get a boilermaker.
  9. danny_galaga
    What is this a reply to?
  10. danny_galaga
    I think the idea is you want it to be quite high pressure, and lots of it, so heat is in the mix there. Possibly running through a 'radiator', which in this case is absorbing heat from the air.
  11. danny_galaga
    You've compelled me to look it up. Seems it's a variation on a compressed air motor, but using liquid nitrogen that is heated to become pressurised gas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_nitrogen_engine As far as I can tell, this is the only car to have used a liquid nitrogen engine
  12. danny_galaga
    Of course if you miss out on nitrous oxide, it's no laughing matter 😀
  13. danny_galaga
    And of course potassium nitrate if ya wanna get a rocket up ya 😀
  14. danny_galaga
    I forgot to mention trinitrotoluene. Plenty of bang for the buck 😀
  15. danny_galaga
    How about ammonium nitrate? That'll give you a hurry up!
  16. danny_galaga
    Unfortunately there's a two way loss that is hard to get around - compressing the air generates lots of heat. Decompressing it, eg driving a piston engine, absorbs lots of heat, potentially freezing up the engine. This was definitely a problem with the model CO2 motors I used. You would actually get ice on the pipes!
  17. danny_galaga
    In fact, I think it was Peugeot that was experimenting with compressed air for a hybrid. Compressing air during braking. I was very excited about the idea, because it's much simpler than batteries. Unfortunately, as you say, huge inefficiencies compressing the air. They dropped the idea.
  18. danny_galaga
    I guess they were thinking of ammonia when they typed it?
  19. danny_galaga
    Doesn't seem like they were in a circuit though.
  20. danny_galaga
    https://generalaviationnews.com/2025/03/26/cessna-172-runs-out-of-fuel-during-flight-lesson/
  21. danny_galaga
    I still shrug in your general direction 🤷‍♂️ 😄
  22. danny_galaga
    Maybe because this is an aviation forum 🤷‍♂️
  23. danny_galaga
    The end game is not to be burning it.
  24. danny_galaga
    For now, that might as well remain diesel. Let's save fossil fuels for necessities like this, and use electric where we can.
  25. danny_galaga
    It's WAY more efficient to store electricity than create hydrogen. That's because the electricity just gets put straight into the grid when needed. Hydrogen needs to be compressed, transported etc. "Multiplying these individual efficiencies finds that just over a third of the original energy input into the cycle remains available for work by its end – a cycle efficiency of about 37%, meaning 63% of the original energy has been lost." https://h2sciencecoalition.com/blog/can-electrolysers-of-the-future-solve-hydrogens-efficiency-problem/ I think it'll still be worthwhile to make SOME green hydrogen, since you need to for industrial purposes other than as fuel.
×
×
  • Create New...