Jump to content

danny_galaga

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,712

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    15

 Content Type 

Everything posted by danny_galaga

  1. danny_galaga
    This forum needs a 😲 smiley
  2. danny_galaga
    It is genuine insight for people like me, who didn't know about the lanes etc that airshow pilots use. That's an insight into what is supposed to be happening, and therefore a clue about why it didn't happen. No one is going to have the answer for a year or so. At least the AOPA guy isn't claiming to have the answer, like some of these other YouTube guys do...
  3. danny_galaga
    Nope. Still a douche. If a cop gives you a directive, you do it. Is a cop familiar with a vintage planes operations? Tells you to stop what you're doing, and then you turn on a boost pump. That's a deliberate provocation. If he was on the highway in a car, he coulda got shot. It would be like being asked to put your hands up, and instead you reach into your jacket. "Oh was just reaching for my licence officer" What an ass...
  4. danny_galaga
    This guy? https://www.ajc.com/news/local/delta-suspends-jailed-pilot/kNz1A9uDMWVK106R6xOPnL/ Don't think I'll listen to anything he has to say...
  5. danny_galaga
    The AOPA guy has extensive airshow experience. I just looked up Juan Browne. Very accomplished, but no airshow experience that I could tell. https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/articles-by-author/richard-mcspadden http://readyfortakeoffpodcast.com/rft-376-youtube-star-juan-browne/
  6. danny_galaga
    Good analysis from AOPA. Commentary by a seasoned airshow pilot (Thunderbirds). Not speculative, just very informative. I learnt a few things watching
  7. danny_galaga
    Reading all I've read here about lights makes me wish I didn't have any. All that extra wiring and weight and an extra switch virtually for nothing. I actually wouldn't have fitted them except the wing tips have a clear section for the lights so I thought I might as well fill it up with something 😄
  8. danny_galaga
    Just in case this wasn't covered in this thread, the 912 powered drones are full sized multi use, indefinite use machines. Think of them as a pilotless reconnaissance/missile platform fighter/bomber. To see what they are about, watch the movie Eye in the Sky. Anyway, just like any aircraft they are designed to fly thousands of times. This is why the engine thieves are quite discerning and only steal new/low hours engines. On condition? Fahgeddabouddit! https://youtu.be/dPFTkvxBpow
  9. danny_galaga
    This cartoonist wasn't far off a couple of years ago
  10. danny_galaga
    Thanks for posting. We still won't know for a year or so of course but certainly leans towards him not being some sort of 'cowboy'. Makes me more inclined to think there was a problem with the aircraft else he himself had a medical emergency.
  11. danny_galaga
    As always, speculation it's just that. However, since these things are supposed to be heavily choreographed, I can't help but wonder if there was something going on with the P63? An medium level problem (clearly not engine out, they looked to be at full tilt) but a combination of things that resulted in a momentary loss of situational awareness? Or a problem with a control surface that given clear air, might have been able to land?
  12. danny_galaga
    In the end, Armstrong and Glenn didn't make much of a showing...
  13. danny_galaga
    You have to be careful with the term 'weight shift'. Shifting weight to control direction was exactly what the Wright's were getting away from, as they could see in the Lilienthal gliders it was a very marginal result (obviously much improved in modern hang gliders). They could see that a bird didn't use weight shifting for control. So in this case, you are shifting weight incidentally, just as you 'shift' your weight when you press your rudder peddle. If they had gone with an upright chair, the controls would have been exactly the same, but connected to a wheel instead of a yoke. They chose to lie prone to reduce drag.
  14. danny_galaga
  15. danny_galaga
    I think it was based on Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004- A Centenary of Flight. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Flight_Simulator_2004:_A_Century_of_Flight
  16. danny_galaga
    What I mean is it was a bit of fun to help people get immersed in the experience. particularly since you lay prone on a replica of the wing section. They weren't really hoping to churn out thousands of new Wright Flyer pilots
  17. danny_galaga
    You're overthinking it 😃
  18. danny_galaga
    The fact it was freakin hard to fly tells me it was pretty accurate 😄
  19. danny_galaga
    Maybe. There was a pretty big queue. I doubt they were going to spend any time briefing people. From memory when it was your turn they might have said something like 'wait until it gets to 25mph then gently pull back'. You've got seconds to work it out before it's someone else's turn. Not a problem the Wright's had 😄
  20. danny_galaga
    When I was in Kittyhawk in 2003 they had a simulator set up. Like the Wright Flyer. So you lay prone. We all thought this would be easy but most of us crashed pretty quickly. You know who did the best? Kids, with no preconceived notions of how to fly a plane. That thing does not fly like anything we are used to.
  21. danny_galaga
    Meh, missed the twenty second editing window on this forum. I meant to mention that the camber formulas were supplied by Octave Chanute, which were wrong.
  22. danny_galaga
    What you are describing is Zeitgeist. And even so, someone did it first. Wilbur and Orville. If someone else did it first, but didn't document it, then the question is much the same as 'If a tree falls in the forest and no one is around to hear it, did it make s sound?'. It's easy for people to say in retrospect 'oh, I did that first' without any real proof. But logically when you look at how much work the Wright's put into the puzzle, and seemingly everyone else did it seemingly on the spur of the moment it just becomes more likely that really the Wright's were first. Even just one aspect- the Wright's discovered that the formula s for wing camber were wrong- resulted in them spending pretty much a whole year building a wind tunnel (which they may have invented too, but I don't think they patented ) and getting the right shapes. And yet for everyone else, all that came 'ex nihilo'. Not to mention things like developing an efficient propeller. No, the compete package rests at the Wright's feet anything else is just hearsay
  23. danny_galaga
    Yada yada yada. Heard it all before. It's true they tried to sue anyone who infringed on their patents for 3 axis control. Probably should have concentrated on continually inventing new things, like Apple does. But so what? That's what the law is for, and they used it. There's no denying their genius. Very resolute guys
  24. danny_galaga
    Was watching a dvd last night I'd been meaning to watch since I first picked it up in Kittyhawk in 2003 😲 Anyway, look at who plays the voices of Wilbur and Orville 😲 span widgetspan widget
  25. danny_galaga
    I think it's really exciting stuff. Eviation are waiting for better batteries though. So the plane that flew is not a pre production prototype, but more of a proof of concept
×
×
  • Create New...