Quite right Bill, I agree totally with your post. The current medical standards set by CASA are quite draconian and should be reformed to meet modern medical standards. In the past, medical issues, colour-blindness or general fitness (or lack there-of) would meet with a medical refusal. It is indeed very good to see a range of issues like colour blindness, blood pressure, heart irregularities (I have a friend who flies commercially with a pacemaker) and now diabeties being relaxed if effective controls are in place to keep everything in the normal range. In the other post regarding diabeties, three month checks by a DAME seem a little "over the top" I would have thought that a six monthly confirmation with your GP and a yearly check with a DAME would be quite affective. My earlier post reflected my opinion on another "regulator" being introduced into the arena with the proposition that it take over private GA (medicals being a major issue). I would much prefer the RAA remain the only governence on recreational flying (monetary commonsense) with an increase of weight to include experimental and simple four seat single engine aircraft VFR by day, OCTA without medicals. ( I can't see any major differences with the skills required to fly a Jab, RV6 or a C182) and for PPL and upwards, a reform in medical standards which is realistic that reflects modern medical controls on pre-existing conditions. As for age related issues, :black_eye: another good friend of mine stopped flying at 76 because his response time to things happening got to a stage where he thought it was too risky to continue. Wasn't a regulator/DAME that told him to stop flying but it was his decision. He is still fit and healthy, still drives across the Nullabor, still goes deep sea fishing and still enjoys going flying with someone else doing the driving.