Thruster88

It is an experimental amateur built aircraft.

It is important to get the correct tube, the wall thickness has to be right for the connector to work. The nut squeezes the tube against the inner piece on the caliper or master cylinders. Look up the type of brake system you have, Matco, etc, they should have the tube type listed in the parts. Also important to use the correct fluid for your system. Most aircraft use red hydraulic oil or ATF. Some use automotive brake fluid. The seals are not compatible with the wrong fluid.

A Rotax 915 would do the job at $69k aud or the 916 at $81k aud. Less the jabiru engine price it is not much more to add for a premium performance personal transport machine.

I see jabiru are releasing the 432 twin jab with 2x 2200 80 hp engines. Engine cowlings are now somewhat easier on the eye than previous examples. Specifications are on the Jabiru Australian site, cruise speed is only marginally better than a single 230 at 125knot TAS and fuel burn is much higher. Single engine performance is not mentioned? With fixed propellers and under carriage I don't see this as a viable twin trainer even with VH registration. What is the market? Put that same 160hp but in one engine, a turbocharged Rotax 916, in that excellent airframe and then you would really have something that people would buy rather than maybe a Sling tsi. An expensive premium model. The drag from having two lumps out there compared to one engine in the nose will not fly in the market place as I see it. What say you all?

Maybe they blocked you, you have said in the past sonex don't want to know about your non standard build. this is an attempt at humour.

One thing is certain, the lawyers won't lose (any money) https://www.mauriceblackburn.com.au/blog/public-place-injury/is-it-safe-to-fly-licences-being-issued-despite-inadequate-training/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR1IS4xXSAwBmd48tdZQ-PUzO1jwnxIeeW9XZUQpz8epeaSNkiDYbtEpdQc_aem_ms8G6BXbR-i5xS5PQSsjIA

I had the alternator field CB pop a few times recently in the RV. Turns out the over voltage protection grounds the field circuit if high voltage is detected, this then causes the CB to pop. New bosch regulator fixed it.

I think it is the realization in light of recent accidents that RAAus is a regulator of aircraft, nothing more nothing less. The good old days of She'll be right are gone. Be interesting to see if a Thruster Gemini / 582 can get a marup given the long history of safe operation.

I installed a uAvionices tailbeaconX ADSB transponder to the RV with the gov rebate. Have a SkyEcho2 for the IN bit and use in the other aircraft IN and OUT. ADSB transponder + SkyEcho2 is a great system as it allows constant monitoring as you fly that both units are working correctly.

This is one reason RAAus active aircraft fleet is in decline. Lose the aircraft lose the member.

No update that I am aware of. I have two flying Thrusters, a t500 and t85 single both un modified. IMHO Thrusters do not require any mods. Replacing an unserviceable propeller with a Bolly will now require a MARUP.

All the rotax 2 stroke gearboxes, B,C and E have helical gears, they still chatter if idled to low. Straight cut gears must be used for a reason in the 912. The big Continental GTSIO-520 producing 375hp has straight cut gears also. Probably the engineers choice rather than a cost of production thing.

If you look closely Onetrack, there is damage to the edge of the hangar over about 2m. In a nose high (stalled) attitude it would only require a small hit on the lower rear fuselage to start buckling. Possibly the left gear leg or wheel hit the fuselage. The nose gear is in a relatively small hole in the roof and appears straight less the nose wheel and fork when it was removed. At normal flying speed the aircraft could not stop that quickly without more damage. At normal flying speed the aircraft would be controllable and the hangar could have been avoided is my pilot thinking.

I have looked at these engines and flown a Thruster with bmw 800 boxer with rotax c gearbox fitted. They are all very heavy compared to a Rotax 912. 5k will get a good used 912 and it is ready to go and proven.

The aircraft was heading towards the panels when it impacted the roof in a deep stalled condition. It has then rotated about 90°. To be so low at the departure end of the runway suggests a possible power problem. My analysis just from the video.