That is the most noteworthy post I have seen on here so far "on track" as it doesn't speculate it is a proper and sensible observation based on the facts known, you call it like it is.
Aeroplanes don't just dive out of control.........unless of course there is a major control surface operation failure which we all know is incredibly rare. The other most plausible factor is the pilot input has put the aeroplane into a circumstance that then caused it to dive out of control.
Therefore it is reasonable to consider Pilot incapacitation or error to be the most reasonable considerations for this accident.
We all know the aeroplane was flying straight and level at around 200 feet towards terrain as shown in the video footage,and "moments"later it had turned approx 180 degrees and nose dived into the water, as per witness account.
The impact point is not in doubt and is clearly close to the waters edge(where the terrain rises steeply). For the aeroplane to have impacted the water so close to a point under the point where it was previously flying straight and level can only suggest it had turned and dived sharply.
I have a question.......why it is it that when an experienced driver crashes his car through someone's front fence there is instant reports on why it happened,speed,loss of control,hit the wrong pedal,skid marks on the road,got distracted,fell asleep,talking on his phone etc.
It's never just "he was experienced" and then in a year,when the facts have been hidden behind "he was very experienced and we don't know what happened" the news is secretly released that the driver is found to have made a mistake.