Bla82,
One - This comment regarding being medically unfit - shouldn't be operating, depends alot on how you define medically unfit. By Casa's definition I am medically unfit. 17 years ago at the age of 20 I developed a genetic medical condition which by Casa's blanket definition deem's me unfit to fly. During this 17 years of managing my condition I have suffered no issues at any time that would have had any affect on my ability to pilot an aircraft.
Some 4 years ago I discovered that under the RAAus system I could fulfil my life long dream to learn to fly. Since then I have become an aircraft owner and completed over 400 hours of incident free flying including a significant amount of long cross country flying.
Two - why can't RAA administer their own medical system.
If you take a look at the paperwork that is supplied with the renewal papers for your RAAus pilot certificate you will see that RAAus request that even if you are "medically fit to drive a car", if you suffer from certain medical conditions which they list, you are required to obtain a statement from your GP to say that this condition is sufficiently well managed to enable you to hold said car licence.
In my own case this is what I do, and I make it perfectly clear to my GP that this document will enable me to fly a recreational aircraft. The GP is also aware of what a "RAAus Aircraft" consists of and under what restrictions we operate.
Unfortunately the Casa system for many conditions is simply a blanket ruling with no provision for assesment on an individual basis. In many cases Casa's rulings regarding medical conditions are far behind the medical worlds ability to manage these conditions and also far behind other world aviation authority's standards.
I have to say that I find it quite offensive for someone such as yourself, who may be fortunate enough to not suffer any condition which prohibits meeting Casa's standards, to stand up and say that we should all be governed by your standards.
I know that I am far from alone amongst RAAus pilots in not meeting Casa standards. Maybe you should consider for a moment how many pilots would be grounded if a higher medical standard were to be introduced? Also consider that in many cases the people affected would by no means only be those with age related conditions.
Would you like to be the one to tell my 15 year old nephew ( also a member of this forum ) who shares my medical condition ( I did say it is genetic ) and solo'ed little over one month ago that he would no longer be allowed to continue to fly?
Unless there is convincing evidence of RAAus's medical standards contributing to accident rates, I feel there is no need to remove the rights of the numerous pilots that either choose or are forced to operate under the RAAus system to achieve the privilege of flight.
Mick