Jump to content

facthunter

First Class Member
  • Posts

    32,791
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1,164

Everything posted by facthunter

  1. This sort of thing discourages you from having things looked at. Nev
  2. NO KNOWN Medical conditions. Nev
  3. Yes you do need a fuel isolator. Nev
  4. Even the best Engines in the world will not run with the fuel cock turned OFF.. Nev
  5. Records of the minutes must be retained by LAW, but it's very inhibiting to make them ALL public. It's not hard to envision the problems. Your liability as a member seems to be limited to ONE Dollar. OFFICE bearers have a greater exposure to risk and they have to be covered also. It's also a non profit Organisation, which is interesting. Nev
  6. It's dead easy to pull up the RAAus constitution and examine it. I have just done so. . Nev
  7. GOOD News stories don't get reported and this is about "Aeroplanes". If it had been a "normal" ambulance, chances are, you would not have heard about it.. . Nev
  8. Good luck to you. When I try THAT one, I get ignored so I just GO with the Flow. Nev
  9. Stupid to have such similar switches near each other. Manual trim is instant almost and bigger planes that the 737 have it. It should also have a "Trim actuating" warning light. otherwise it's an accident waiting to happen. Nev
  10. This is one instance of Oldies coping with "change" better than youngsters. and I CAN SEE the benefits of these new fangled ELECTRIC cars. Just call them "Cordless" and they will "get" what's happening. Nev
  11. There's a proper way to go about building/designing such structures. Ask to see the computations and see / check if they meet your expectations. I wouldn't go for JUST making it. They'll easily worm out of Paying out by claiming the wind weas stronger than what the design met. Nev
  12. THIN sheet is suss. It easily crumples and can be ripped with set of vice Jaws and a bit of strength. A pathetic gusset in a corner with bendy beams will never be rigid. You NEED trusses that are triangulated and the Proper computations The IG DOOR at one end complicates things You have to engineer a triangle ideally at both sides of the opening to make the corners stay square viewed from the front elevation Nev
  13. There's an error in that also. It NEVER had FULL left trim. How to you centre rudder trim Quickly? B 737 rubbish. Nev
  14. It's ALL a bit of a mess really Isn't it? Compared to just about any other layout.. Nev
  15. Something wrong with all that. It's easy to see/check if the rudder trim is not centred. I don't trust U tube to be authoritative. Nev
  16. It all looks too lite for me. Nev
  17. There's no mention whatever or details of any propulsion. The "Wright FLYER" was able to be banked and was more manoeuvrable than any design hitherto. The counter rotating props cancelled out assymetry. The engine was built in house. Glen L. Curtis offered to build one for them. Wright also taught themselves to fly at the same time. Nev
  18. The more facts you have the better your OPINION will be, and you do need "AVIATION expertise" to interpret the FACTS. in aviation matters. Nev
  19. Dust Devil Land. Very damaging potentially on the ground OR in the Air. Nev
  20. O P Omniscient Person. GOD is omniscient. Nev
  21. The dorsal fin is there to energise the rudder. The very forward positioning of the wheels will make it a bit directionally sensitive.. Done so you can use more braking . Nev
  22. Not really. They might just accept it as inevitable to have other advantages, Like driving up the ramp to load and being able to slide stuff off it in flight. Nev
  23. I've seen rings mounted to a long concrete beam level with the ground surface. That would work OK. Councils attitudes to Aerodromes is extremely Variable. I'd quietly make contact with other users on the way to go about things and then go upfront. Nev
  24. Reduce the existing deficit of pressure in the area. Another way of looking at it.. Nev
×
×
  • Create New...