Jump to content

Fred

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    31

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Fred

  1. Fred
    I guess it would depend on the particular school Nev. for example the CFI where I have done my BFRs for the last 10+ years, includes a partial engine failure on take off in every BFR.
  2. Fred
    And the point of that statement is?
  3. Fred
    The big difference between commercial and private flying is what is EXPECTED of a professional pilot. (leaving aside the issues of duty hours & overloading) Both are using forecasts and everybody accepts the variations involved there. The major difference is at the planning stage - if the flight is ”legal“ including fuel reserves, alternates etc. the competent pilot is expected to complete the task - the option of I’ll just wait another day as in private flying Is not a option (Call it commercial pressure if you like). The issue that arises is when the conditions change from the forecast ones. This then becomes a human decision (occurring at 150-200 kts). Yes the relevant rules still apply but the only one who knows what the actual conditions are is the one in the cockpit. Mistakes are made unfortunately but more more rules will not change that. It is easy to make decisions in hindsight but human factors (& I dislike the overuse of the term) is what comes into play. Management will never say get in or crash trying. CoR legislation will not address these type of situations - certainly could have an effect on matters such as maintenance shortcuts and the like.
  4. Fred
    Given up !
  5. Fred
    ?????? No opinion or seeking opinion of MM???????
  6. Fred
    Been there done that until the constitution change, I refused to nominate or have any part of what IMO was a very backward step handing effectively full control to 4 individuals - an Australia wide organisation with effectively NO regional input, it was never going to represent member’s views. But hey, 800 people gave them their proxy votes so I accept I must be the one out of step, so instead of beating my head against a brick wall I am just watching the predictable outcomes. (I was the RAA regional representative on the RACPAC committee also but resigned from that after the change as I refused to be a regional representative for an organisation that doesn’t believe in regional representation. Remember the voting by post code repetitive comments from Canberra - enough said)
  7. Fred
    It was forecast - from the time we let these clowns to have total control of what was previously a members organisation - it has been all down hill. No doubt the usual supporters of “GA mini” will come out in support of this approach with LAME maintenance and class 2 medicals unrealistic and unsustainable fees - it is time to get rid of this tripe. There is no point in paying membership fees AND registration if maintenance & medical requirements are the same - just go GA and forget MINI GA. OR regain control of RAA.
  8. Fred

    Membership

    Fred replied to Fred's topic in Governing Bodies

    I paid $215 last year and $245 this year. - that is a $30 increase to me pretty simple
  9. Fred
    Obviously with the RPL not limited to Townsville Only like the proposal (as I read it).
  10. Fred
    2 GA schools. Both doing fixed wing GA. One also does rotary the other does also RAA. Both train in Townsville class C. They have different names for their rotary & RAA operations but in fact are only 2 operations. A different RAA school at Woodstock & nil currently at Bluewater. RAA & GA flight school at Ayr does RPL CTA training into Townsville also which has resulted in several Jabiru owners going into & transiting YBTL class C at will. The comical situation arises when you see the RAA/GA school in Townsville using 3 Foxbats - one registered GA and the other 2 RAA. Same aircraft type, same instructors, same building but different CFIs. The Ayr operation has the same CFI for both.
  11. Fred
    Townsville
  12. Fred

    Membership

    Fred posted a topic in Governing Bodies

    Just renew my RAA membership, increase of $30, is there no end to this BS.
  13. Fred
    There is already RAA training approved & happening for some time in class C.
  14. Fred
    Funny really, progressively more people are coming to realise the major mistake we made a couple of years ago. At some stage enough will realise what is happening, hopefully before it’s too late to regain control of what was once a members organisation. The horse may have already bolted though.
  15. Fred
    CTA for suitablely equipped RAA aircraft is already available by virtue os CAO 95.55 with a RPL. Any CTA endorsement for a RPC would be the same as a RPL i.e. content and medical so nothing gained.
  16. Fred
    Too late for that. With the changed board to 7 (remember it was proposed to be 5) total control in vested in 4 people, and with no regional representation you get exactly the outcome the have. Chickens are now coming home to roost. But that is what they majority who bothered to vote chose and some still believe in the choice so we can sit back and watch the outcome. I believe more regulation & less freedom is the order of the day with our new mini GA approach - what has occurred so far is only the beginning with the current uncontrolled leadership. But it was all pointed out BEFORE the change was voted on & members had their choice who to believe.
  17. Fred
    Whilst I agree your statement is correct, I suspect the numbers would be negligible. Also watch for the RAA approach to licensing in relation re medicals for an increase in weight - nothing out yet, but do you trust the current administration as I certainly don’t. They have already proposed a seperate yearly medical at 75 which was only removed from the proposed ops manual after it was pointed out that a yearly medical is already required for a driver’s licence. I say watch closely.
  18. Fred
    Not a big word BUT.
  19. Fred
    Without owner maintenance they are kidding themselves but with the current Raa approach it was expected as has been previously discussed.
  20. Fred

    New fuel laws

    Fred replied to jetjr's topic in Governing Bodies

    Be aware that a change to must “land” with 30 minutes intact is a major change from plan 45min reserve (the earlier version). Think in terms of strict liability offences. Don’t just accept the hype.
  21. Fred
    That exception alone defies logic on its own - a MTOW for a particular design is simply that i.e. a MTOW. One could argue if extra weight for floats is sound then extra weight for fuel should also apply, considering the landing weight with fuel would not be exceeded. Then naturally the MTOW ceases to be a MTOW. The 600kg MTOW is a class limit as opposed to the safe certifiable weight limits of many LSAs.
  22. Fred

    New fuel laws

    Fred replied to jetjr's topic in Governing Bodies

    The current instrument
  23. Fred

    New fuel laws

    Fred replied to jetjr's topic in Governing Bodies

    Securite??? I have only heard this term used with boating.
  24. Fred
    Sill for sale Nev, “Deflecting Beam Torque Wrench” not cheap but I like the simplicity and reliability of them. - no compressed spring to loose tension over time
  25. Fred
    It is a sad reflection on society these days. Aircraft and equipment was NEVER under threat until “relatively” recently - a lot of the equipment is not useable outside aviation - a basic indication that grubs have entered an industry that was once an honourable profession/hobby.
×
×
  • Create New...